Not sure there needs to be any humble pie over Umaga, iirc most of the debate around him was over not giving him a chance at the end last year, followed by speculation as on here. I think we were right in our selections generally towards the end, although I will concede that ten was a hard one to call. Like most people I am a bit fact deficient, and like most I was slightly worried when Umaga was not announced with the others.
I don't think there should be much humble pie at all required for any view, beyond that served up for the way things are expressed, which can be bang out of order with some posters there. Thinking Dai is not very good is allowed- Rob Smith has been critical of Dai and not just over the loss at TH having literally said " don't rate Dai" in the past prior to that, and almost nobody here has complained. So it is allowed to not rate him, it is just the manner in which people say it, and the multiple repetitive threads that are the issue.
I will admit that the site is easier to read after a W.