Mike... I agree.
I'm an old, but rubbish prop, so maybe it's why I agree with a lot of what you say.
Jones' reputation as a short term head coach preceded him.
We reaped the benefits of that initially and then eventually started to lose a few games.
However, I feel that the reputation does Jones a disservice.
Unless you're in charge of the All Blacks, every coach will have winning and losing runs, however, a pattern has formed whereby Jones will get a long winning run at the start of his tenure.
It's obvious that that will eventually tail off over time.
He gets the players to play above themselves, the team punches above its weight for a period of time, but that can't last forever.
People could see possible issues from the outside, and I'm sure that all of the coaches could see them from the inside too, but it's a very brave man who makes changes while a team is riding the wave.
Ultimately, we appear to be back to a traditional English team.
Power up front and a fair amount of power behind too... With some possible X factor thrown in (I'm thinking Daly, Manu, as well as the Vunipolas and Itoje)
I definitely agree also that at times the attitude in camp hadn't seemed like it's a happy place.
My approach to sport has always been about making it fun.
That being said, maybe international rugby shouldn't be about having a laugh with your mates. That's what club rugby is for.
Maybe international rugby should be about winning
Stuart Lancaster is getting a lot of plaudits now, but certainly didn't as England head coach, he was criticised for many bad decisions and ultimately he had an appalling world cup.
I don't get how Jones has had his contract renewed, and I certainly wouldn't be making the same squad selections as him, but if England have a successful world cup, I'll put that to one side and accept that he's doing ok