It's actually a really good article, and interesting that the writer feels that it was public pressure that forced Eddie to play Daly at 15.
In hindsight, I like Eddie's conviction. Once he's made his mind up then it takes a lot for it to be changed.
I know some will disagree, but that's a good virtue in a head coach / manager, otherwise the team would change every time a different player scores a difficult try for their club
I agree with the masses that Daly's defence is suspect, or more to the point, his positioning is often debatable meaning he's left with difficult tackles that are often lost hopes.
Regardless of the cause, it's an important skill for a full back.
What I hadn't fully appreciated is what he adds in attack.
I'm used to seeing his step / arc / acceleration used at 13, or his straight line pace at 11.
When I don't see those from full back I don't notice his contributions.
Obviously you see him pop up occasionally and put a pass out to the winger, but maybe there is more that I've been missing.
For years we talked about how players like Cipriani and Wade generated more point during opportunities than they cost, and we lambasted various changes for ignoring that.
Jones feels that's the case with Daly so I feel like I should back that decision too