Is this where the RFU are failing in one of their core raison d'etre.. to develop the game on a broader base at grass roots level. Are they more interested in stocking their wine/gin cellars and packing out Twickers?
Yet again on this board I find myself in the uncomfortable position of defending the RFU.
They are a non profit making organisation so the money they get from packing out Twickers gets spent on rugby & nothing else. For years they have pumped money into grass roots clubs, I know its been interrupted a bit at the moment but given the numbers of people that shell out upwards of £90 for a ticket to England games & part with £70 for a shirt, they will be back in profit again soon.
As a former club secretary for a small struggling amateur club, I can confirm that the RFU give away a LOT of money to help with things like flood lights, building improvements, flooded pitch damage (we had a visit from the Twickenham, head groundsman, he almost had a heart attack when he saw our pitch!) etc. All they require is a reasoned business case & degree of accountability from the receiving clubs.
Do they get it right all the time? No of course not, like any governing body in any sport anywhere in the world they make mistakes, sadly they get slagged off as incompetent, out of touch, only in it for their own gain etc etc, like every other governing body!
The sporting landscape has changed & so has the social one. There is plenty of young players coming through & contrary to popular opinion they don't only play for posh fee paying schools, plenty of state schools play rugby in Kent & South London for example.
However once lads get to 17 or 18 & have to work, sometimes at weekends & have other sporting & social options, they tend to drift away a bit. Clubs that once put out 4 or 5 squads on a Saturday, now get out 2 or 3 & that can be a struggle. However the Ladies & Girls game is growing at a huge rate and it had a very much younger demographic so the death of rugby is not imminent (all IMO of course)