Thing is that Daily Mail article came out well in advance of all of this. Saying it was only Wasps and Glaws I believe that were putting in place 25% paycuts. Now it's the whole league pretty much. I think the Mail dislike us (or have a writer that does), so often seem to try and stick the knife in.
In addition, that was 25% paycut when a legal option could have been to simply furlough the players. I'd expect furlough money would have been closer to a 90% paycut for the likes of Sops.
Considering there weren't threats of leavers, and we weren't mentioned in other articles pointing out those clubs that had handled it badly, it makes me think that whilst we were looking at this perhaps earlier than other clubs, that extra time to prepare may have meant we approached the players in a better fashion.
The fact that Lima took a 25% cut could suggest he plans on staying here longer term, equally, maybe it doesn't, since he could have taken perhaps a smaller cut for a longer contract. Or that we only wanted him for 1 more season.