Firstly, I'd like to say congratulations to them both, within the current parameters for honouring sports men and women its well deserved.
That said, I really don't like this trend of honouring sports men and women for achievement while they are still playing, not least because they could still do something embarrassing, but mostly because they are awarded for doing something they enjoy and often, as with Olympic medallists, paid for by the tax or lottery player.
People often think the trend started with Ian Botham, but that's wrong. His first award was for using his fame to raise awareness of, and a lot of money towards, childhood leukaemia. His cricketing achievements were secondary.
I would like us to return to the days when people were awarded for their contributions to a sport after they'd retired when we can judge the fullness of their careers.
Another +1 for Matt