I must stop writing about England...but this is what I find most perplexing.....(well amongst many) The number of people across the platforms I read/contribute to, that seem to be Eddie fans.
His record with other sides is decent enough with some big downs and a clear ability to coach a team to win one off matches like Japan vs SA or Eng vs NZ in the RWC, but seems to have a blindspot when it comes to how teams operate over time.
For England - he inherited a squad and team that still has under Stuart Lancaster, the best 6N's % win record (80% - every year) a big win against and a good tour of NZ and the core of the U-20 teams over several seasons including the World Cup winners. So whilst Lancaster did the major sin of fouling up at a home RWC, in all other measures, his England was pretty good. So coming in and winning the GS and having a good tour vs a fading Australia are good results, but not really evidence of the second coming. And the inept 6Ns in 2018 and Tour to SA saw England on their longest losing streak for ages and playing like they forgot the key objectives.
A RWC for any of the top teams really is a question of winning three games (qualifying is taken as read) and England have always, since I first went to Twickenham in the early 70's, had access to big and effective packs able to beat anyone. So the challenge for England was usually elsewhere - and that was being tackled once the U-20's etc was taken seriously to supply players to the senior team.
So if Jones is that good, excuses like "waiting to do the attack nearer the RWC" sounds like the sort of management balls I've heard in business too often - when projects fail/are delayed. But here we are, wasting chances to test out players and tactics and seemingly a coach who doesn't seem to have watched the same games we all have in recent times. And acting as if the need to build on the good play/players from RWC 19 isn't important. Not as important as proving himself right, regardless.