Wasps to 'review policies' after ban plea for 'novelty Native American headdress

[hookender]

Makes you wonder how much SWcomms were paying to sponsor. Could be it was a lot above market rate and no one is prepared to match  / come near it.

 Also with decision re stopping betting companies sponsoring football shirts ( presume rugby & cricket too) at least 9 high profile sides will be available for major companies to give money to.

[Raggs]

I suspect a lot of bigger companies will want to avoid the Exeter controversy to be honest. Rugby isn't big enough for it to outweigh the bad press they'll get.

Maybe a fancy dress company could be willing to!

[Vespula Vulgaris]

Makes you wonder how much SWcomms were paying to sponsor. Could be it was a lot above market rate and no one is prepared to match  / come near it.

It was SW Comms sponsorship that made Ex the only profitable club in the GP. But oddly their own profits dropped massively at the same time...

[Raggs]

Makes you wonder how much SWcomms were paying to sponsor. Could be it was a lot above market rate and no one is prepared to match  / come near it.

It was SW Comms sponsorship that made Ex the only profitable club in the GP. But oddly their own profits dropped massively at the same time...

I strongly suspected that was the case, but could never find real evidence for it (like in terms of just how much sponsorship was given).

[andermt]

They don't break out the sponsorship in their accounts. It is mentioned in the writings about how it's broken down, but only on the latest accounts.

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03320422/filing-history