The article was a bit nothing-y for those of us who frequent wasps message boards, but probably did raise valid points for those who don't and who may red articles on rugbypass.
Despite that, the real question is, would you take 5-10 years of Wasps followed by a possible complete failure, or would you rather there was no wasps at all?
That's ultimately the situation we were in previously.
Was an extra 8 years of a Wasps team existing worth it?
If it wasn't, then it isn't now either
If it was ok then, then there's an argument that it's worth the risk now...... After all, it's none of us taking the risk