I can't disagree with it either.
It's not a nice feeling to no longer be particularly proud to be a Wasp.
+1
I can, however, see a fudge coming down the line, which will be that Wasps receive 'temporary' permission to play there, subject to some provisos:
The first is that it be time limited. Given the lack of alternative 'suitable' stadia, New Wasps might argue the need for a 3, or maybe 4, year permission. A totally Phoenix WW team could not hope to be back in the Championship before then.
Second. New Wasps must build a new stadium, back within 'their' region (away from Worcester).
Third. New Wasps must retain and use Henley as their training ground, or build a new facility as part of their new build stadium.
Fourth. New Wasps must have submitted plans for the new stadium before the 24/25 season starts. This must include an actual planning application and HOA with the landowner.
I noticed on the Warriors board that the user Bumchin on that board is (he says he was secretary of Leamington FC - AKA Brakes - for 16 years). I think he was the match secretary who recently resigned, who was Richard Edy, of Redditch (according to LinkedIn). The same club who I said were hoping to be tenants at the new Warwick Community Stadium. He did reply to one of my posts to say my suggestion of Wasps moving there was utter tosh (well, words to that effect). He didn't explain why the project had gone cold, why Brakes had not said anything publicly for some time. Indeed, their website is currently down (probably coincidence, as it was up, but I see that their domain registration expired today. It looks to be hosted by a brand within the Newfold Digital Group, which is never a good sign. They are to web hosting as Delboy was to an upmarket department store.)
There was some mention of Brakes losing their stadium and I am pretty sure I saw talk of a planning application in Warwick DC for housing, (I can't find any planning application) but it was rejected (maybe at discussion phase) because the Harbury Lane/Fosse Way junction (at Chesterton) was too dangerous and needed upgrading to either a roundabout or traffic lights (the latter with pedestrian and cycle provision). And, right now, and due to last another year, massive road works are underway to build traffic lights there. It was an incredibly dangerous junction, with a LOT of accidents. My guess is, now those works are underway, the application to build housing there can be revived. In turn, that was why Brakes needed a new stadium. I am not sure who actually owns the current ground, but I doubt it is the club themselves (it isn't in their accounts), more likely a connected party, or even the Warwick District Council. One thing is sure, Brakes are in a parlous, but not dire, financial situation, and certainly could not offer any financial contribution to a new stadium, so any talk of it being 'theirs' is fluff.
What do the Council Cabinet minutes say about the Community Stadium site? The last mention I can see is from last July, when they were still looking for a developer (== funds), and keeping any discussion private. Also keeping Brakes and ward councillors 'in consultation'. Some of the other projects, like the new athletics track and footpaths, seem to be progressing, albeit slowly.