Always a Wasp
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
46
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Jacob and Paolo
« on: November 18, 2023, 09:35:28 AM »
Quite a good article behind the Times Paywall dated yesterday.
48
Wasps Rugby Discussion / 10 Changes that should be made - Article
« on: November 13, 2023, 03:30:53 PM »Ten simple and effective law changes that should be made to rugby refereeing
After consulting with coaches, analysts and fans, Telegraph Sport has compiled a list of 10 easy tweaks that could quickly improve the game
By Charles Richardson, Rugby Reporter 13 November 2023 ? 11:47am
Although deemed a success, the Rugby World Cup was plagued by the vagaries and nuances of officiating.
Coaches complaining about referees, controversial decisions, and officials and their families receiving death threats were as commonplace ? and provoked more conversation ? than any wonder try or highlights reel emanating from France.
It would not be unreasonable to suggest that the World Cup, while magnificent, masked several of rugby?s issues. It is a sport which, currently, is still not quite sure what it wants to be. It was too easy for defenders to be kings, leaving attackers as paupers. There are too many stoppages, not enough urgency. Those who wish to spoil receive greater reward than those who wish to create. While both must be allowed to germinate in any team sport, the balance in rugby has tipped too far the wrong way. In a sport ? and world ? which is growing increasingly homogenous, creativity should be regarded as sacred, not left to peter out or play second fiddle.
The genie might be already out of the bottle. But, there are a couple of fundamentals to rugby as a sport in 2023: the teams are performing at a level whereby the spectacle is inhibited by the laws; and the laws ? or, more specifically, World Rugby?s interpretation of them ? are simply too arcane and complex to be applied consistently at tournaments like the World Cup, where the stakes are high.
After internal debate and consultation with coaches, analysts and fans, Telegraph Sport has compiled a list of 10 easy tweaks that could be applied to the laws of the game in a heartbeat. Perhaps, greater fundamental change is required, but such measures might end up tarnishing the fabric of the sport. These 10 tweaks are simple and effective; edicts to improve the sport in terms of spectacle and competition without compromising what makes it great.
1. Stop coaching
This might be the toughest, given how ingrained it has become, but it is also, paradoxically, one of the easiest. Referees need to communicate less. If a player is offside from chasing a kick, don?t tell them to get back, penalise them! If a player is offside at a ruck, don?t tell them to retreat, penalise them! If a player is deemed as off their feet at a ruck and continues to contest for the ball, don?t tell them, penalise them! They will not do it again. Discipline would improve tenfold, with players not willing to take the risk, keen to push the laws to the absolute limit ? and beyond.
The auxiliary benefit, too, would be that non-English-speaking teams would benefit, given they are palpably hampered every time they take the field with an English-speaking referee. Referees should speak with their whistle and little else.
2. Reduce TMO involvement
With the insidious increase in the power of the television match official, season on season, how long will it be before artificial intelligence is refereeing rugby matches? The TMO has been allowed to increase its remit for years, to a fault. There was the near-farcical situation at Gloucester on Friday night, when Bath captain Ben Spencer was sin-binned for a cynical offside on his own line but, because the infringement came in a try-scoring opportunity, the TMO was glancing at a potential Gloucester knock-on a few phases earlier. Had the spill been deemed as a knock-on, what would have happened to Spencer, who was yellow-carded for a non-dangerous act of foul play that occurred in a sort of vacuum period of the game which shouldn?t even have taken place? It would not have been the first instance in the past few years where rugby and the Hollywood blockbuster Inception had crossed paths.
The TMO?s remit should encompass try-scoring placements and severe acts of foul play only. That?s it. No slow-motion replays of forward passes ? more on that later ? and knock-ons, no slo-mo footage of ambiguous double movements.
And the bunker, while positive at a surface level, ended up causing more problems than it solved at the World Cup. It was a bit like taking paracetamol for tonsilitis; sure, it might improve the symptoms for four hours, but the infection will still require medical attention. A cure.
3. Turn all scrum penalties into free-kicks
This does not require much explanation. Too many games are decided on arbitrary scrum calls. The scrum is a way to restart the game. It is a fierce battleground, of course ? and must remain as such ? but teams scrummaging for penalties as a way of winning matches should not be allowed to continue.
Rightly or wrongly, the fact is that the narrative around scrums has become too negative for some time ? as Rob Baxter highlighted last week. Removing the risk of conceding a match-deciding penalty could result in more completed scrums, fewer resets, and greater competition for the ball. One leading analyst who spoke to Telegraph Sport said they would go even further, changing all infringements ? except dangerous, cynical or repeat offences ? to free-kicks. Too revolutionary for now, perhaps, but certainly worth monitoring.
4. Tidy up maul laws
This really only applies at line-outs ? which is bonkers in itself, given a set-piece maul, in rugby?s laws, has no separate code ? but mauls in this area are beyond messy. Players being instructed to ?not change their bind? by the referee; an action which involves their arms only, and allows them to do whatever they like with their bodies, except ?swimming?, where a player slides up the side of a maul illegally.
Most farcical, however, is that if opposing players end up on the attacking side of the maul ?legally?, with the ball available, when the scrum-half attempts to play the ball they are ?legally? entitled to dart straight for him or stick out hands and feet to disrupt him, because they are part of the maul and, therefore, the offside law of hindmost foot does not apply to them. Madness.
5. Enforce ? and tighten ? the ruck ?use it? countdown
The easiest tweak of this list? Referees could be stricter with enforcing the ?use it? law, whereby a team must play the ball five seconds after the referee has deemed it available. As it stands, this often leads to the dreaded ?caterpillar ruck? ? which would be tough to define, and therefore ban, in itself ? so enforcing this law would disrupt its formation. Only a positive. Could the limit be lowered to three seconds, too? Or, perhaps, once the referee has called ?use it?, the ball is automatically out after five seconds, rather than a resulting scrum?
6. Goal-line drop-outs should be for held-up only (at best)
A goal-line drop-out for the ball being held up over the line is more acceptable ? if only slightly ? but rewarding a team for kicking the ball into in-goal encourages a negative mindset ? and more kicking. Also, kicking the ball with enough power to reach the goal-line but not enough to roll dead has become a skill in itself in the sport ? which is a troubling avenue for rugby to go down. If the goal-line drop-out has to remain, then it should be for held-up, try-scoring opportunities only. If a team kicks the ball over the try line and the opposition touch it down, then it should revert back to a 22-metre drop-out.
7. Solve disparity in card severity
This is simple. No one disputes that Sam Cane?s tackle in the World Cup final was more severe than Siya Kolisi?s. But was the former?s really that much more severe than the latter?s to result in a punishment that was so much harsher? Cane off the field for the whole match; Kolisi for 10 minutes ? and millimetres, split-seconds decided it.
Cane absolutely deserved a harsher sentence ? which, along with his subsequent citing and three-match ban ? he received, but did New Zealand deserve to play the rest of the match with 14 while the eventual champion Springboks were forced to do so for just 10 minutes? Absolutely not. Of course, punishments need to be staggered to mirror degrees of severity but right now rugby has either life sentences or nights in the cells. It cannot continue. A 20-minute orange card for head contact could be the answer.
8. Reward jackalling that is only clearly and obviously legal
Easier said than done with the whistle in hand, but certainly an easy directive to enforce at boardroom level. Banning the jackal in its entirety might be the answer ? a philosophical shift to rugby?s engineering would require more research ? as like so many facets of the sport, the defensive side gains too much of an advantage. As Telegraph Sport revealed in the World Cup, some referees at rugby?s showpiece were favouring the defensive side as often as 70 per cent of the time in terms of breakdown penalties. That is not the fault of the officials, who deserve sympathy in this area. There are often millimetres between a legal and illegal jackal, and the only way to discern the difference accurately and regularly is by getting on your hands and knees and using a magnifying glass.
As it stands, players take advantage of this, knowing that they might get away with an illegal jackal and that, in any case, it is worth the risk. Referees give the benefit of doubt to the defender too often. Unless a jackaller is clearly and obviously legal ? with absolutely no floor contact and no knee resting on the ball-carrier ? then they should not be rewarded with a holding-on penalty. And, as highlighted in entry No 1, if they are not supporting their own body weight, then they should be penalised immediately ? not afforded a warning by a loquacious referee.
9. Prohibit dummying at scrums and rucks ? already in law
This is already enshrined in rugby?s laws, yet scrum-halves get away with murder in this area, dummying mainly box-kicks but also passes from rucks, scrums and mauls. It is yet another example of the kicker being king. Prohibit the dummying and allow more pressure on the clearance.
10. Abolish the nonsensical ?direction of hands? forward-pass law
No one knows what a forward pass is anymore. If anyone even dares to contest that they do, they are either a wizard or a liar. Passes which look blatantly forward are cleared owing to the direction of the attacker?s hands, while passes which often look marginal are analysed to within an inch of their life. There is probably a television angle to prove that most flat-looking passes in a match travel either forwards or backwards, such is the trickery of the camera.
Rugby must return ? without the TMO?s input ? to a more anecdotal approach to forward passes. If it looks forward, it is. If it doesn?t, it is not.
49
Wasps Rugby Discussion / LoL: TMOs and 'paralysis by analysis' is killing rugby (Wasps Content)
« on: November 09, 2023, 10:52:12 PM »Lawrence Dallaglio: TMOs and 'paralysis by analysis' is killing rugby
Rugby World Cup winner believes the game's powerbrokers must cash in on the afterglow of a superb World Cup
By Jeremy Wilson, Chief Sports Reporter 9 November 2023 ? 5:03pm
Assistant Referee Nic Berry and Referee Mathieu Raynal watch the big screen as the TMO reviews the play during the Rugby World Cup France 2023 Quarter Final match between England and
Lawrence Dallaglio has issued a call for rugby to use the World Cup as a modernising springboard and has warned against ?paralysis by analysis? with video reviews.
The 2003 World Cup winner has seen how other sports have connected with new audiences and wants rugby to open up its stars to the wider public, including in-game interviews with head coaches and mandatory media appearances from captains and directors of rugby.
Dallaglio also suggested consulting World Cup final referee Wayne Barnes to help balance video replays with speeding up the game, and for the Government to consider an independent financial regulator following the suspensions of London Irish, Worcester and Wasps.
?We need to stop analysing ourselves by action replay in every single situation ? it?s paralysis by analysis,? said the former England captain, warning that it risked ?killing? the game.
?We want to get the right decisions but we also want a game that flows. That I understand is a difficult balance. You?ve got a DOR [director of rugby] on the one hand sending you 15 video replays of the game where decisions should have been made in a different direction. But on the other side, they sit down and say, ?speed the game up?.
?Where does the referee?s role start and finish? Wayne Barnes refereed the World Cup final brilliantly but seemed to get criticised very unfairly, grotesquely and wrongly, because of the decisions made outside of his remit with the TMO [television match official].
?As far as I can remember the referee used to be the guy who made the decisions. That?s rugby?s challenge - being able to make the product really interesting, fun and digestible, not just on the pitch but off it as well, and grow the audience but equally using technology in the right way.
?A lot of people, who have got a lot of respect in the game - coaches and players - are saying, ?maybe we are going just a little bit too far?. Maybe we should get people like Wayne Barnes much more involved, and find the right answers to making the game well refereed but also fluid.?
Dallaglio is also urging rugby?s players, coaches and governing bodies to think about how they can ?piggy back off a wonderful World Cup? and attract supporters beyond the core fanbase.
?The game needs to help itself by giving us the personalities,? said Dallaglio, a pundit for TNT Sports. ?By the end of a World Cup, people know who are playing for England again - I?m talking about if you?re not a rugby fan. We need buy in. I think players and clubs can be a lot more part of the solutions.
?We need the captain after the game to talk about his team?s performance. We need the DOR [director of rugby] after the game and before the game. During the game, why can?t we have the lead coach? He could chat. The only way we are going to grow our game is if people can identify with the personalities and the characters. You watch F1 - you get the head of McLaren, the head of Mercedes [talking] ? you don?t get the third coach.
?People want to understand the personalities. They want to hear from the best players, they want to hear from the best coaches. They shouldn?t be allowed to hide away. I think that they should be non-negotiable if you want the cheque at the end of the season.
?Continually showing head contact collisions is not going to help the game. If you continually show cars smash into each other, you tend not to be too excited about driving. We need to market, and grow the game in the right way, showing the right things, while recognising that concussion and player welfare are very, very important.?
Dallaglio also believes the way the start of the Premiership season has merged into the World Cup must now be capitalised on.
?You?ve got this incredible interest in what was a magnificent international tournament and then some of the best players in the world are coming back to the English league and playing there,? he said.
?We?re 80 days away from the Six Nations. Steve Borthwick will be looking for players he feels are the right players to take England forward - many of which he has in his squad now - but there?s got to be some additions. You?ve got an opportunity to sprint out of the blocks between now and Christmas.
?I always liked the old school competition for places. I don?t like international squads being named early. I think it gives people a comfort they don?t deserve. International squads should be announced a week before you get together. There should be a bit of jeopardy and excitement around them.?
Dallaglio remains a director at Wasps, who have just announced plans to potentially relocate to Kent, where talks are ongoing with Sevenoaks District Council over a new multi-use stadium for elite sport.
?There is a real appetite within Wasps to get Wasps to return to the highest league possible,? he said. ?Obviously there needs to be a bit of clarity from the RFU and Premiership Rugby. Is there any funding?
?There are lots of lessons to be learnt on how to finance rugby going forward. I think Wasps are looking for a mix of institutional and private investment so there isn?t a single point of failure.
?The King [in the King?s speech] has announced that the Premier League [in football] will have an independent financial audit. Maybe the King should announce that rugby should have that same level of independent financial governance.?
50
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Rugby on course for 2028 Club World Cup
« on: November 09, 2023, 09:34:06 AM »Rugby on course for 2028 Club World Cup
European chiefs reveal there is ?real warmth? towards tournament amongst northern and southern hemisphere sides
By Daniel Schofield, Deputy Rugby Union Correspondent 8 November 2023 ? 3:51pm
European rugby chiefs insist there remains ?real warmth? towards a Club World Cup but concede the new competition would not launch until 2028 at the earliest.
Dominic McKay, chairman of the European Professional Club Rugby, which organises the Champions and Challenge Cups, revealed that there is a strong appetite in both hemispheres to establish a Club World Cup which he believes would also attract considerable interest from broadcasters.
?There?s a warmth on trying to identify once and for all who is the greatest club in the world, I think that?s the mantle a lot of European and South African clubs like the challenge of, trying to settle that argument,? McKay said. ?There?s a real warmth to develop a World Club Cup and a number of the clubs from France and the UK were pushing this quite hard.
?The one thing I would say is there is a real warmth behind this project in a way that rugby?s got lots of great projects that never quite see the light of day. This one has got one warmth from both the northern hemisphere and the Southern Hemisphere and I?m very pleased about that.?
The current working model would be for eight clubs, which would include the South African franchises from the United Rugby Championship, to qualify from the Champions Cup pool stages, who would then face eight clubs from the southern hemisphere in a straight knockout competition contested over four weekends.
There had been plans to launch the Club World Cup in 2025 but this has now been delayed for at least three years as administrators work through the significant logistical challenges. McKay says that any new competition must benefit the players as well as becoming a sustainable part of the rugby calendar.
?We want to do something that?s meaningful and has a pattern of regularity,? McKay said. ?We?re looking at doing something, if we can, potentially in 2028 and potentially 2032. We?re working towards that and we?re having great dialogue with our colleagues in the southern hemisphere. I suspect the next few months will be really instructive on that.?
McKay was speaking from the first EPCR club conference in Toulouse, which gathered representatives from 42 clubs, eight unions, three leagues, the Six Nations, World Rugby and figures from the women?s game. One of the overriding conclusions from the meeting, he says, is that ?no part of the game can be successful without a genuine interaction between the club and international games?.
McKay also confirmed that launching a women?s version of the Champions Cup is ?something that we?d love to do? although it is still in the early stages. ?There is a very active discussion ongoing at the moment around that,? McKay said.
?We want to do that in a respectful and timely manner, so we?re at the foothills of that as a project but we?re very encouraged from the clubs and unions to try and deliver something in the short to medium term on that one.?
Yet despite potentially launching two new competitions into an already congested calendar, McKay conceded that the format of the showpiece Champions Cup needs to stay the same after several years of tinkering with the structure.
?We?ve got a job to do across the global game to ensure that we excite and inspire our existing supporters and the supporters of the future by making it easy and accessible for them to enjoy the rugby both in the stadium, but also on broadcast,? McKay said.
?The point about having settled structures and having easy-to-understand formats is really very uppermost in our mind. We don?t want to make changes just for the sake of changes in the future.?
51
Wasps Rugby Discussion / English rugby union adjusts to grim reality as RFU thrashes out new deal
« on: November 07, 2023, 03:09:01 PM »
English rugby union adjusts to grim reality as RFU thrashes out new deal
Crisis-hit domestic game faces watershed season as remaining Premiership clubs await new professional game partnership
Luke McLaughlin - Guardian
Tue 7 Nov 2023 11.00 GMT
Last modified on Tue 7 Nov 2023 12.16 GMT
Memories of the Rugby World Cup are already fading. Regrets over chances missed, matches let slip away, even futile complaints about referees are receding into the background. Packed away for the next four years, perhaps, as the champions? trophy tour concludes in South Africa.
Fans and players in England should be focusing on their bread and butter: the weekly churn of domestic top-flight fixtures, a full diary of dates up and down the country, with the Six Nations punctuating the progress of a packed domestic schedule.
But that is not the case for Worcester Warriors, Wasps or London Irish. A seven-week sojourn in France provided a welcome distraction for many fans, with the scrum-half Danny Care expressing his sincere hope that English success could ?filter through? to the grassroots. But the domestic game now faces a new reality following Worcester?s demise more than a year ago, an event that ushered in a series of catastrophes.
First the Warriors, then Wasps, then London Irish folded. The collapse of Jersey Reds, the Championship title holders, was the latest blow. While the daily news cycle moves on, the disintegration of these clubs remains an ongoing tragedy.
?It has left a void in the city,? says Bob Low, a long-time supporter and board member of Worcester Warriors Supporters Association, a newly-formed body with what he calls the ?romantic ideal? of returning elite rugby to Sixways. ?There?s a definite void at the moment. You go the pubs and there?s something missing. And there?s certainly something missing from my weekends.?
It is a similar story for Duncan Kendall, vice chair of the London Irish Supporters Club, who still has player awards to hand out for last season for a professional club that no longer exists. ?I need to go to a couple of Premiership games because I want to give the players permanent mementos,? Kendall says. ?Our player of the season, Tom Pearson, is up at Northampton now. And Chandler Cunningham-South [young player of the season] is at Harlequins. It?s quite sad in a way.?
If this all sounds depressing that?s because it is, but neither it is an attempt to talk the game down. Had England held firm against South Africa in that semi-final and found a way past New Zealand the following week, there is little doubt the resulting hype would merely have papered over some ever-widening cracks.
Of course it is much easier to focus on problems rather than find solutions. Wasps are planning a revival, the Warriors too are investigating a potential route back. ?There?s talk someone might put together a ?phoenix? club,? Kendall says of the Exiles, whose amateur side celebrates its 125th anniversary this year. ?But it would be a whole new set of people and players.?
Still, fundamentally, the numbers stubbornly refuse to add up for too many clubs. Inflated wage bills, over-reliance on wealthy benefactors and a general trend of falling attendances are just some of the issues. The suspension of relegation from the top flight, while reassuring in the short-term for clubs, is also having a pernicious effect: the lack of jeopardy that means for many fixtures is profoundly damaging to the product. Given the reduced number of games, too, a discount will surely be due to the TV rights-holders (TNT Sport declined to comment).
?I don?t think you can fiddle about at the edges of this problem because it?s so significant,? Leicester?s former chief executive, Simon Cohen, told the Guardian in June. ?Unless you significantly change the governance model you?re not going to be able to do anything. I?ve seen lots of talk about getting more revenue. I think that?s a complete red herring. It?s about having a sustainable model.?
On which note, the Rugby Football Union is negotiating a new professional game partnership with the objective of restructuring what the chief executive, Bill Sweeney, calls a ?broken? system. The hope is for details of the new agreement to be made public next month.
Closer marketing efforts between the RFU and Premiership Rugby will form part of it as well as plans for ?hybrid? England player contracts. While marketing is a key pillar of any future strategy, social-media impressions do not pay the rent, and remodelling England players? contracts feels like tinkering around the edges of a systemic problem.
Asked if player salaries must be reduced in coming seasons Exeter?s director of rugby, Rob Baxter, said on Sunday: ?It will depend, because every club is set up differently. If you?re set up to be a profit-making business that has to settle debts, you will have to run your player wages differently to a club that can have an investor who?s prepared to throw money away at the end of every season. It?s not for me to decide which one is the right model and which one is the wrong model.?
While there is nothing inherently wrong with wealthy backers, it is far from a robust way to operate a business. Just ask anyone who works in professional cycling. ?We?ve got to promote the good stuff and stop bringing up the bad stuff as the only important thing in the game,? Baxter continued. ?My only hope [for the forthcoming deal] is that the game as a whole in this country comes to an agreement about how we can all talk and feel positively about everything that?s important in rugby.?
When Covid hit in 2020, London Irish?s Mick Crossan said he could no longer afford to run the club at a loss of ?4m a year. ?We were aware that Mick was pumping money in,? says Kendall. ?But you don?t believe that?s ever going to stop. You believe it?ll sort itself out.?
There is a consensus that something drastic needs to change. Sweeney has said the forthcoming deal is a chance to set aside self-interest. It must be hoped that principle applies to the RFU, and Sweeney himself, as much as any other player in the game.
Crisis-hit domestic game faces watershed season as remaining Premiership clubs await new professional game partnership
Luke McLaughlin - Guardian
Tue 7 Nov 2023 11.00 GMT
Last modified on Tue 7 Nov 2023 12.16 GMT
Memories of the Rugby World Cup are already fading. Regrets over chances missed, matches let slip away, even futile complaints about referees are receding into the background. Packed away for the next four years, perhaps, as the champions? trophy tour concludes in South Africa.
Fans and players in England should be focusing on their bread and butter: the weekly churn of domestic top-flight fixtures, a full diary of dates up and down the country, with the Six Nations punctuating the progress of a packed domestic schedule.
But that is not the case for Worcester Warriors, Wasps or London Irish. A seven-week sojourn in France provided a welcome distraction for many fans, with the scrum-half Danny Care expressing his sincere hope that English success could ?filter through? to the grassroots. But the domestic game now faces a new reality following Worcester?s demise more than a year ago, an event that ushered in a series of catastrophes.
First the Warriors, then Wasps, then London Irish folded. The collapse of Jersey Reds, the Championship title holders, was the latest blow. While the daily news cycle moves on, the disintegration of these clubs remains an ongoing tragedy.
?It has left a void in the city,? says Bob Low, a long-time supporter and board member of Worcester Warriors Supporters Association, a newly-formed body with what he calls the ?romantic ideal? of returning elite rugby to Sixways. ?There?s a definite void at the moment. You go the pubs and there?s something missing. And there?s certainly something missing from my weekends.?
It is a similar story for Duncan Kendall, vice chair of the London Irish Supporters Club, who still has player awards to hand out for last season for a professional club that no longer exists. ?I need to go to a couple of Premiership games because I want to give the players permanent mementos,? Kendall says. ?Our player of the season, Tom Pearson, is up at Northampton now. And Chandler Cunningham-South [young player of the season] is at Harlequins. It?s quite sad in a way.?
If this all sounds depressing that?s because it is, but neither it is an attempt to talk the game down. Had England held firm against South Africa in that semi-final and found a way past New Zealand the following week, there is little doubt the resulting hype would merely have papered over some ever-widening cracks.
Of course it is much easier to focus on problems rather than find solutions. Wasps are planning a revival, the Warriors too are investigating a potential route back. ?There?s talk someone might put together a ?phoenix? club,? Kendall says of the Exiles, whose amateur side celebrates its 125th anniversary this year. ?But it would be a whole new set of people and players.?
Still, fundamentally, the numbers stubbornly refuse to add up for too many clubs. Inflated wage bills, over-reliance on wealthy benefactors and a general trend of falling attendances are just some of the issues. The suspension of relegation from the top flight, while reassuring in the short-term for clubs, is also having a pernicious effect: the lack of jeopardy that means for many fixtures is profoundly damaging to the product. Given the reduced number of games, too, a discount will surely be due to the TV rights-holders (TNT Sport declined to comment).
?I don?t think you can fiddle about at the edges of this problem because it?s so significant,? Leicester?s former chief executive, Simon Cohen, told the Guardian in June. ?Unless you significantly change the governance model you?re not going to be able to do anything. I?ve seen lots of talk about getting more revenue. I think that?s a complete red herring. It?s about having a sustainable model.?
On which note, the Rugby Football Union is negotiating a new professional game partnership with the objective of restructuring what the chief executive, Bill Sweeney, calls a ?broken? system. The hope is for details of the new agreement to be made public next month.
Closer marketing efforts between the RFU and Premiership Rugby will form part of it as well as plans for ?hybrid? England player contracts. While marketing is a key pillar of any future strategy, social-media impressions do not pay the rent, and remodelling England players? contracts feels like tinkering around the edges of a systemic problem.
Asked if player salaries must be reduced in coming seasons Exeter?s director of rugby, Rob Baxter, said on Sunday: ?It will depend, because every club is set up differently. If you?re set up to be a profit-making business that has to settle debts, you will have to run your player wages differently to a club that can have an investor who?s prepared to throw money away at the end of every season. It?s not for me to decide which one is the right model and which one is the wrong model.?
While there is nothing inherently wrong with wealthy backers, it is far from a robust way to operate a business. Just ask anyone who works in professional cycling. ?We?ve got to promote the good stuff and stop bringing up the bad stuff as the only important thing in the game,? Baxter continued. ?My only hope [for the forthcoming deal] is that the game as a whole in this country comes to an agreement about how we can all talk and feel positively about everything that?s important in rugby.?
When Covid hit in 2020, London Irish?s Mick Crossan said he could no longer afford to run the club at a loss of ?4m a year. ?We were aware that Mick was pumping money in,? says Kendall. ?But you don?t believe that?s ever going to stop. You believe it?ll sort itself out.?
There is a consensus that something drastic needs to change. Sweeney has said the forthcoming deal is a chance to set aside self-interest. It must be hoped that principle applies to the RFU, and Sweeney himself, as much as any other player in the game.
52
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Massie-Ferguson Speaks
« on: November 05, 2023, 10:58:07 PM »My ?Marshall Plan? to save English club rugby
Exclusive: Premiership Rugby chief executive vows no more clubs will go bust this season but warns game in England is ?not out of the woods?
By Ben Rumsby 3 November 2023 ? 11:48am
Massie-Taylor said it could take up to five years for Premiership clubs to recover
The chief executive of Premiership Rugby has vowed no more of its clubs will go bust this season under its ?Marshall Plan? to rebuild the ravaged domestic game.
In his first major newspaper interview since the current campaign got under way three weeks ago, Simon Massie-Taylor admits the sport in England is not ?out of the woods? amid its worst crisis of the professional era but insists that no Premiership team faces imminent collapse.
With an epic World Cup having now drawn to a close, the club game will be under more scrutiny than ever following last season?s demise of Wasps and Worcester Warriors and that this summer of London Irish.
In a wide-ranging sit-down with Telegraph Sport that lays out Premiership Rugby?s blueprint for recovery, Massie-Taylor says:
It will take up to five years to complete and clubs will continue to lose money
There are plans to cut a salary cap that is controversially returning to pre-Covid levels next season
There are talks with the Government about making clubs? repayments of Covid-19 bailout loans more manageable
A new two-division Premiership could adopt rugby league?s new grading system that will see social media followers contribute towards promotion and relegation
Hybrid contracts for England players and a radical shake-up of top-flight academies are both part of a new Professional Game Partnership (PGP) to be unveiled next month.
It was in August last year that the news ? first reported by Telegraph Sport ? that Wasps and Worcester were facing winding-up petitions from HM Revenue & Customs lit the fuse on an unprecedented crisis in the English game.
While too late to rescue those clubs, or even London Irish or Championship winners Jersey Reds, measures have since been put in place to prevent a repeat under what Massie-Taylor dubbed Premiership Rugby?s ?Marshall Plan? - the name coined for the reconstruction of Europe after the Second World War.
The rugby version has so far included the launch of a National Football League (NFL)-style sporting commission and much closer scrutiny of clubs? solvency, culminating in the formation of a Financial Monitoring Panel.
It was this improved ?early-warning system? that emboldened Massie-Taylor to give a one-word answer when asked if he could guarantee all 10 Premiership clubs would survive the season.
?Yes,? he said, before playing down concerns raised last term about Harlequins in particular. ?Harlequins are fine.?
Massie-Taylor's 'Marshall Plan' is designed to prevent more clubs going the way of London Irish
Not that Massie-Taylor was complacent amid what a report by MPs in January concluded were ?clearly unsustainable? annual losses averaging ?4 million per club.
?This is really a four or five-year recovery plan if we?re honest,? he said. ?We?re still in a fragile state and we?re in a fragile state with the economy as well.
?So, I don?t think the sport?s out of the woods yet. I think what we have got ourselves into a position in, with the Premiership, is to have much more visibility with club finances.
?There still is a group in a loss-making position and will be for a while. That?s the reality.?
That will arguably not be helped by the decision to end after this season an emergency cut in the salary cap from ?6.4 million to ?5 million brought in during the Covid-19 pandemic.
Massie-Taylor said there were plans to reduce it again until ?revenues get to a certain level? but not before 2025.
He added: ?It?s not perfect because we?re overstretching ourselves at the moment. But you?ve got to think about the market, the player market.
?We need to be competitive with France, need to be competitive globally generally. So, that bit?s tricky.?
The salary cap quandary is further complicated by the fact Premiership Rugby is trying to convince the Government to make repayments of its clubs? Covid bailout loan ? which at one point totalled ?124 million ? more manageable.
Revealing that Premiership Rugby submitted its ?Marshall Plan? to ministers last month, Massie-Taylor said: ?What we?re trying to do is find a way in which we can pay that back in an affordable way, so that the taxpayer isn?t at any more risk.?
Included in that submission, and likely of most interest to rugby fans, was the planned launch of a two-division Premiership from 2025 featuring 10 clubs in the top tier and 12 in the second.
It is hoped that, by then ? or even sooner in a way that could bring everything forward by a year ? one or more of Wasps, Worcester, London Irish and Jersey Reds return from the abyss to take part in the new competition.
Which clubs make the cut, and in what division, is likely to provoke a heated debate, one Massie-Taylor stoked with an enthusiastic endorsement of rugby league?s controversial new grading system that takes into account social media followers and match attendances.
?When we look at criteria for promotion and relegation through Prem 1 and Prem 2, you?ve got to look at some of that template,? he said.
?It?s like going to the gym: you don?t just focus on your guns, you focus on everything else.
?You?ve got to look at the total picture. Because, otherwise, you?re just putting the system in jeopardy.?
The ?total picture? also includes halting the recent talent drain to France and Massie-Taylor confirmed that Premiership Rugby and the Rugby Football Union had ? as revealed by Telegraph Sport ? reached an agreement that would see England?s current 45-strong elite player squad replaced by an arrangement that would give head coach Steve Borthwick much greater control of a core group of around 20-25 players.
Massie-Taylor said: ?It will also, hopefully, provide those 25 players with more income certainty, which will help when we?re talking around player contract negotiations and moving to France.?
He also confirmed Telegraph Sport?s revelation last month that another feature of the new PGP would be the introduction of an NFL-style draft system at Premiership academies to combat a lack of game time for young English players.
?Britain?s got talent but it needs to be farmed and nurtured,? he said.
For now, though, just getting through a Premiership season without a club going bust would be no small achievement.
53
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Premiership academies set for radical shake-up with NFL-style draft
« on: October 25, 2023, 10:33:41 AM »Premiership academies set for radical shake-up with NFL-style draft
Exclusive: Under new system, each team would be allowed to keep a certain number of players from each year group of their own academy intake
By Daniel Schofield, Deputy Rugby Union Correspondent, in Paris 24 October 2023 ? 4:11pm
Premiership academies are set for a radical shake-up with the introduction of an NFL-style draft system as part of the new Professional Game Agreement, Telegraph Sport can reveal.
Improving the development of talent has been seen as a key priority by both the Rugby Football Union and Premiership Rugby with a collective recognition that young English players are not getting enough game time.
During their Under-20 Six Nations match this year, France?s squad had made 102 starts in the Top 14 versus England?s eight starts in the Premiership. England Under-20s lost the match 42-7.
With the Premiership losing three teams to insolvency over the past 12 months, there will be a significant redrawing of the academy boundaries as well as the introduction of a draft-style system to ensure a more equitable distribution of the best young players around the 10 teams and in future to clubs in the proposed second tier Premiership 2.
Each team would be allowed to keep a certain number of players from each year group of their own academy intake and the remainder would be allocated via a form of draft, although the precise mechanism has yet to be decided. In the NFL, the worst team from the previous season gets the first pick of that year?s best college players and it has grown into one of the biggest spectacles of the American sporting calendar.
The RFU would also have a more direct role in individual players? development programmes and although Premiership clubs would still retain control of all playing decisions.
Part of the issue within the current model is in the inequitable distribution of talent among the clubs, who are only allowed to recruit players to their academy from within set geographical boundaries. As Pat Lam, the Bristol Bears director of rugby, has repeatedly pointed out, their patch only includes just two of the 100 leading rugby schools while Harlequins have more than 20 within their catchment area.
?I can tell you now that I?ve been here nearly six years, the system is flawed for young players,? Lam said. ?When you look and you ask the question, and I used to always say this when I was back in New Zealand and coaching in Ireland, ?how is the country that has the most resources, financially and player-wise, not the No1 rugby nation in the world?? And the problem that you?ve got is that it?s the only country that has a system that has boundaries on young players which is, to me, the biggest problem you?ve got.?
Under the new system, if a club had three promising locks on their books they may only be able to retain two and the third would be allocated to a team short of cover in the second row to provide greater playing opportunities. The Rugby Players? Association are also lobbying to ensure there is a minimum wage for academy players and they would be compensated for moving across the country.
?We can?t just continue with clubs having 40 academy players and teams just hoovering up anyone they can, hoping they find a gem,? a source close to the negotiations said. ?We need to make it more elite than that. At the same time, we don?t want teams just hoarding the best talent for the sake of it.?
54
Wasps Rugby Discussion / PRL racing to try to get TV Deal
« on: October 23, 2023, 10:50:30 PM »Premiership Rugby racing to strike TV deal with TNT Sports before football auction ends
Broadcasting executives want to secure a discount on the next round of rights
By James Warrington 23 October 2023 ? 6:04pm
Premiership Rugby is racing to strike a TV rights deal with TNT Sports before the Premier League auction ends as the broadcaster pushes for a discount on its next contract.
TNT, which was rebranded from BT Sport earlier this year, has only one more season to run in its three-year domestic deal for Premiership Rugby rights.
But executives want to secure a discount on the next round of rights after three clubs were suspended amid a financial crisis gripping English club rugby.
Advisers have urged Premiership Rugby, which is the top tier of club rugby union, to reach an agreement before the end of a separate auction for Premier League football rights, which kicked off last week.
TNT is expected to bid for at least one of the five packages of football matches, and an industry source said Premiership Rugby could strike a better deal if it wraps up talks quickly.
The insider added that they thought TNT ? then known as BT Sport ? had overpaid for the current three-year rugby contract, which is worth ?110m.
It comes amid a crisis gripping the Premiership, which is now a 10-club competition after three teams dropped out.
London Irish was banished from the league in June after it missed a deadline to pay staff and players and was unable to prove it had the finances to compete in the 2023-24 season.
Wasps and Worcester Warriors were both removed from the league last year.
TNT, which is a joint venture between BT and Warner Bros Discovery, will argue that the dropouts have reduced the value of the TV rights.
The broadcaster had initially considered demanding a rebate, but will instead seek a discount on the next three-year contract.
Tom Harrington at Enders Analysis said: ?Even without taking into account downward pressure on sports rights costs and subscription fees/ad revenues (which makes monetisation harder) and a clear drop in the quality of the competition (with fewer teams), TNT should be in line for a big reduction.?
TNT?s simultaneous talks over football and rugby rights will be overseen by Andrew Georgiou, an experienced broadcasting executive who was promoted to lead Warner Bros Discovery?s media business in the UK and Ireland over the summer.
Mr Georgiou will be tasked with maintaining the channel?s presence in sports rights while trying to trim down costs for Warner Bros Discovery, which is grappling with a debt pile of almost $50bn.
A fall in income from broadcasting rights would come as a further blow to Premiership Rugby clubs, which are struggling to professionalise and create sustainable business models.
The league has been ring-fenced for the last two seasons, meaning there is no threat of relegation for the worst-performing teams.
Sources said this had led to a slump in viewing figures, particularly for matches featuring clubs at the bottom of the league.
The upcoming season will introduce a play-off between the team that finishes bottom of the Premiership and top of the Championship.
Premiership Rugby is also in separate talks with the Rugby Football Union (RFU) to agree terms of a new Professional Game partnership, which is understood to be worth ?128m over the next four years.
TNT Sports and Premiership Rugby declined to comment.
Broadcasters are also going head to head in auctions for top-flight French and Italian football rights.
Italy?s Serie A has sold its TV rights to Sky Italia and sports streaming company DAZN for a combined ?4.5bn, Bloomberg reported.
However, France?s football body has been forced to cancel an auction for Ligue 1 rights after failing to attract any suitable bids.
55
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Rather Pathetic collection of words by BBC
« on: October 20, 2023, 02:22:42 PM »
Rucks and Riches: English rugby 'at rock bottom and trying to move ourselves out' - https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/67070361
56
Wasps Rugby Discussion / RFU - Promotion & Relegation from Pirates site
« on: October 20, 2023, 10:40:23 AM »
Championship Promotion and Relegation
Posted by: Pirate15 (IP Logged)
Date: 19 October, 2023 22:02
On the eve of the start of the championship season the RFU have confirmed the promotion and relegation criteria.
Promotion
The bottom placed premiership side will play off against the winners of the championship over 2 legs with the winner playing in the premiership next season subject to the club meeting the MSC.
Relegation
There will be no relegation from the championship this season.
Promotion National One.
The winner of National One will be promoted to the championship for the 2024-25 season.
This seems a rather strange statement as I thought it was the intention of the RFU and PRL to reduce the size of the championship (premiership 2) to 10 teams for 2024-25 as part of the new professional game agreement.
Posted by: Pirate15 (IP Logged)
Date: 19 October, 2023 22:02
On the eve of the start of the championship season the RFU have confirmed the promotion and relegation criteria.
Promotion
The bottom placed premiership side will play off against the winners of the championship over 2 legs with the winner playing in the premiership next season subject to the club meeting the MSC.
Relegation
There will be no relegation from the championship this season.
Promotion National One.
The winner of National One will be promoted to the championship for the 2024-25 season.
This seems a rather strange statement as I thought it was the intention of the RFU and PRL to reduce the size of the championship (premiership 2) to 10 teams for 2024-25 as part of the new professional game agreement.
57
Wasps Rugby Discussion / British and Irish super league plan discussed and could include South Africa
« on: October 19, 2023, 09:26:49 AM »
British and Irish ?super league? plan discussed ? and could include South Africa and Italy
Exclusive: The competition could be created within the next three years as executives attempt to fight against the current financial climate
By Gavin Mairs, Chief Rugby Union Correspondent, in Paris 18 October 2023 ? 6:54pm
Talks to establish a British and Irish ?super league? that would also include clubs from South Africa and Italy have taken place between executives from the home unions and the leagues, Telegraph Sport can reveal.
It is understood that initial discussions have already taken place at the World Cup and the catalyst is a shared sense to capture and recreate the atmosphere, colour, and drama of the tournament in France by exploring what would be the most radical overhaul of the club game since the sport turned professional in 1995.
It is understood there are also moves for greater collaboration between the URC, Premiership Rugby, the Six Nations and British and Irish Lions to pool back-room resources to dramatically reduce the costs of running the competitions and increase shared revenues and attractiveness to investors by centralising resources.
?There?s an energy to create a better future for the club game,? said one leading executive at the World Cup.
?We?re all flatlining, surviving, and making ends meet, whereas if you?re really serious about growing the game, we need to look at what formats are open to us and what would it take to be brave enough to step into that new world??
One of the previous sticking points to the concept of uniting the English Premiership and the URC ? which features teams from Ireland, Scotland, Wales, Italy and more recently South Africa ? has been the detrimental impact it would have on the European Champions Cup.
However, one solution has been put forward for an ?FA Cup-style? knock-out competition involving clubs from the French Top 14 to ensure it retains its point of difference within a revised European domestic structure.
Further talks are set to resume following the World Cup next month, which are expected to dive deeper into the detail of how a new league would be structured, with the aim of establishing a new competition within the next three years, to coincide with the introduction of a ?world club championship?.
?For the first time it seems that Premiership Rugby, who had previously said ?no, no, no? to any such talks are open to the idea of looking at a way of creating a kind of super league,? added another source close to the talks.
The Premiership currently consists of 10 clubs following the financial demise of Worcester, Wasps and London Irish last season, while the URC has 16 clubs. The next stage of the negotiations is to look at how integration of the two leagues would work.
?It is complicated, but one proposal would be for two leagues based on merit, and promotion and relegation between the two, or two conferences ? a Premiership and URC one, to qualify for knockout stages,? said another source close to the talks.
?Currently it is quite difficult for one broadcaster to invest in three or four competitions,? said one leading executive at the World Cup. ?Whereas if you form a British and Irish league, it makes the conversations with broadcasters much easier. You could have one rugby channel that increases the value of the broadcasting deal and clubs could grow their attendances. There is validity in it.?
The Six Nations already aggregate their broadcasting and commercial revenues as part of a deal known as ?Project Light? and there is an expectation that a similar arrangement would bolster club finances.
Underpinning the desire for change is also to create more invigorating and attractive domestic club fixtures, including reviving the historically great Anglo-Welsh clashes, as a solution to the challenging financial climate.
?When you get it right, like at this World Cup where you are getting very good teams playing against very good teams and great jeopardy, we should not have to wait four years for that to happen,? a source added.
?Every year there should be unbelievable games. In fairness the European final this year was incredible, but we need to get more moments like that.
?This is a leadership issue thing as well. We are seeing executives who are no longer the traditional ?blazers? but more forward-thinking people who are trying to really grow the game but also in some respects, bring back some of the great stuff we?ve lost: the great derbies and rivalries of yesteryear.?
The prospect of an Anglo-Welsh league was first tabled in Jan 1999, when the Welsh Rugby Union were offered five places for Welsh clubs in the English league system. The offer was turned down, however, with the WRU instead forging ahead with a link with Scotland and Ireland to establish the Celtic League, which evolved into the Pro 12 and now the URC.
An Anglo-Welsh Cup was established in 2005, involving 12 Premiership and four Welsh clubs, as a knockout tournament but was replaced by the Premiership Rugby Cup in 2018.
Revelations about talks over new domestic league structure come just a week before the World Rugby council is due to sign off a new ?Nations Championship? tournament involving teams from the Six Nations and Rugby Championship, set to start in 2026, which will be held every two years to avoid clashes with the World Cup and Lions tours.
Exclusive: The competition could be created within the next three years as executives attempt to fight against the current financial climate
By Gavin Mairs, Chief Rugby Union Correspondent, in Paris 18 October 2023 ? 6:54pm
Talks to establish a British and Irish ?super league? that would also include clubs from South Africa and Italy have taken place between executives from the home unions and the leagues, Telegraph Sport can reveal.
It is understood that initial discussions have already taken place at the World Cup and the catalyst is a shared sense to capture and recreate the atmosphere, colour, and drama of the tournament in France by exploring what would be the most radical overhaul of the club game since the sport turned professional in 1995.
It is understood there are also moves for greater collaboration between the URC, Premiership Rugby, the Six Nations and British and Irish Lions to pool back-room resources to dramatically reduce the costs of running the competitions and increase shared revenues and attractiveness to investors by centralising resources.
?There?s an energy to create a better future for the club game,? said one leading executive at the World Cup.
?We?re all flatlining, surviving, and making ends meet, whereas if you?re really serious about growing the game, we need to look at what formats are open to us and what would it take to be brave enough to step into that new world??
One of the previous sticking points to the concept of uniting the English Premiership and the URC ? which features teams from Ireland, Scotland, Wales, Italy and more recently South Africa ? has been the detrimental impact it would have on the European Champions Cup.
However, one solution has been put forward for an ?FA Cup-style? knock-out competition involving clubs from the French Top 14 to ensure it retains its point of difference within a revised European domestic structure.
Further talks are set to resume following the World Cup next month, which are expected to dive deeper into the detail of how a new league would be structured, with the aim of establishing a new competition within the next three years, to coincide with the introduction of a ?world club championship?.
?For the first time it seems that Premiership Rugby, who had previously said ?no, no, no? to any such talks are open to the idea of looking at a way of creating a kind of super league,? added another source close to the talks.
The Premiership currently consists of 10 clubs following the financial demise of Worcester, Wasps and London Irish last season, while the URC has 16 clubs. The next stage of the negotiations is to look at how integration of the two leagues would work.
?It is complicated, but one proposal would be for two leagues based on merit, and promotion and relegation between the two, or two conferences ? a Premiership and URC one, to qualify for knockout stages,? said another source close to the talks.
?Currently it is quite difficult for one broadcaster to invest in three or four competitions,? said one leading executive at the World Cup. ?Whereas if you form a British and Irish league, it makes the conversations with broadcasters much easier. You could have one rugby channel that increases the value of the broadcasting deal and clubs could grow their attendances. There is validity in it.?
The Six Nations already aggregate their broadcasting and commercial revenues as part of a deal known as ?Project Light? and there is an expectation that a similar arrangement would bolster club finances.
Underpinning the desire for change is also to create more invigorating and attractive domestic club fixtures, including reviving the historically great Anglo-Welsh clashes, as a solution to the challenging financial climate.
?When you get it right, like at this World Cup where you are getting very good teams playing against very good teams and great jeopardy, we should not have to wait four years for that to happen,? a source added.
?Every year there should be unbelievable games. In fairness the European final this year was incredible, but we need to get more moments like that.
?This is a leadership issue thing as well. We are seeing executives who are no longer the traditional ?blazers? but more forward-thinking people who are trying to really grow the game but also in some respects, bring back some of the great stuff we?ve lost: the great derbies and rivalries of yesteryear.?
The prospect of an Anglo-Welsh league was first tabled in Jan 1999, when the Welsh Rugby Union were offered five places for Welsh clubs in the English league system. The offer was turned down, however, with the WRU instead forging ahead with a link with Scotland and Ireland to establish the Celtic League, which evolved into the Pro 12 and now the URC.
An Anglo-Welsh Cup was established in 2005, involving 12 Premiership and four Welsh clubs, as a knockout tournament but was replaced by the Premiership Rugby Cup in 2018.
Revelations about talks over new domestic league structure come just a week before the World Rugby council is due to sign off a new ?Nations Championship? tournament involving teams from the Six Nations and Rugby Championship, set to start in 2026, which will be held every two years to avoid clashes with the World Cup and Lions tours.
58
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Championship Funding - nicked from Pirates
« on: October 14, 2023, 12:55:41 PM »
Championship Funding new
Posted by: Pirate15 (IP Logged)
Date: 13 October, 2023 19:24
Coventry rugby Executive Chairman Jon Sharp has posted a statement online in which he reveals details of the proposed new RFU/PRL agreement.
Very worrying are his comments about the possible levels of funding for the next 8 years.
" Many informed critics of the previous eight-year PGA claimed the RFU could not afford it. However, the new PGP apparently increases the amount provided to Premiership Rugby Limited (PRL) by ?76m to ?296m.
Because 27 per cent of PRL is owned by CVC Capital Partners, the latter will receive c.?80m of this. While unconfirmed it is believed that during the new PGA, the Championship will receive c.?32m over the same eight years.
If these figures are correct then it makes a mockery of Bill Sweeney's recent comments in support of the championship (Premiership 2).
The one bright spot is that the RFU have handed back the rights to sponsorship and media to the league who are now free to seek their own league sponsor and any TV coverage.
Posted by: Pirate15 (IP Logged)
Date: 13 October, 2023 19:24
Coventry rugby Executive Chairman Jon Sharp has posted a statement online in which he reveals details of the proposed new RFU/PRL agreement.
Very worrying are his comments about the possible levels of funding for the next 8 years.
" Many informed critics of the previous eight-year PGA claimed the RFU could not afford it. However, the new PGP apparently increases the amount provided to Premiership Rugby Limited (PRL) by ?76m to ?296m.
Because 27 per cent of PRL is owned by CVC Capital Partners, the latter will receive c.?80m of this. While unconfirmed it is believed that during the new PGA, the Championship will receive c.?32m over the same eight years.
If these figures are correct then it makes a mockery of Bill Sweeney's recent comments in support of the championship (Premiership 2).
The one bright spot is that the RFU have handed back the rights to sponsorship and media to the league who are now free to seek their own league sponsor and any TV coverage.
60
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Championship Clubs v RFU
« on: October 06, 2023, 02:44:02 PM »
At last it looks like the championship clubs are willing to stand up to the RFU and PRL and fight for a fairer share of funding and recognition of our part in the development of future England players.
In my opinion this is long overdue and unless we get what we deserve we should refuse to be a part of this new agreement and go our own way.
This would be hugely embarrassing for the RFU and Sweeney on the back of a world cup.
The Championship clubs together with their various owners and benefactors met in emergency session on the morning of Wednesday October 4th to discuss the way ahead in the context of both the progress of the Professional Game Partnership and the sad news relating to Jersey Reds.
They agreed on the following points:
The group as a whole expressed very low levels of confidence in the RFU and its representation of our interests in discussions over the Professional Game Partnership (PGP). Any such partnership must serve the interests of our clubs and communities or it will not be a ?partnership?.
The Championship does not accept any construct of the PGP that excludes our clubs from discussions of funding levels and other matters crucial to the recovery of the game in this country, such as the player-pathway. These all impact our participation in a potential Premiership 2 (P2), which was supposed to be part of a new whole-game restructure for Professional rugby.
The owners and benefactors of Championship clubs have however agreed to continue to analyse the viability of P2, as requested by the RFU, to the extent that they can.
The clubs in attendance shared their views on their willingness and ability to continue in the light of the dramatic cuts to their funding, which surely made the collapse of Jersey Reds more likely.
As clubs who are crucial, among others, to the development of the next generation of England internationals, we are deeply concerned that issues vital to that pathway have not been discussed with us. We believe that our very role in those plans has effectively been sold off in the PGP discussions. We also believe that the player-development role that Championship clubs can most effectively play depends entirely on our clubs having greater control of young players on that pathway than is currently the case. Consequently, we propose to actively review our relationships with Premiership clubs and our role in developing their young talent.
A clear necessity forced on us by recent events is that we must take steps to ensure that we are in control of our own destiny. In that regard we are delighted to welcome Ben Blanco, former global sponsorship lead at Heineken, as commercial consultant, and Simon Cohen, former chief executive of Leicester Tigers, as our independent member. Having two individuals of such experience and standing in the game will hold us in good stead as we analyse all opportunities ahead, bearing in mind that we now own our commercial and broadcast rights for the next two years at least.
The clubs agreed that a statement outlining these points should be released as soon as practicable.
In my opinion this is long overdue and unless we get what we deserve we should refuse to be a part of this new agreement and go our own way.
This would be hugely embarrassing for the RFU and Sweeney on the back of a world cup.
The Championship clubs together with their various owners and benefactors met in emergency session on the morning of Wednesday October 4th to discuss the way ahead in the context of both the progress of the Professional Game Partnership and the sad news relating to Jersey Reds.
They agreed on the following points:
The group as a whole expressed very low levels of confidence in the RFU and its representation of our interests in discussions over the Professional Game Partnership (PGP). Any such partnership must serve the interests of our clubs and communities or it will not be a ?partnership?.
The Championship does not accept any construct of the PGP that excludes our clubs from discussions of funding levels and other matters crucial to the recovery of the game in this country, such as the player-pathway. These all impact our participation in a potential Premiership 2 (P2), which was supposed to be part of a new whole-game restructure for Professional rugby.
The owners and benefactors of Championship clubs have however agreed to continue to analyse the viability of P2, as requested by the RFU, to the extent that they can.
The clubs in attendance shared their views on their willingness and ability to continue in the light of the dramatic cuts to their funding, which surely made the collapse of Jersey Reds more likely.
As clubs who are crucial, among others, to the development of the next generation of England internationals, we are deeply concerned that issues vital to that pathway have not been discussed with us. We believe that our very role in those plans has effectively been sold off in the PGP discussions. We also believe that the player-development role that Championship clubs can most effectively play depends entirely on our clubs having greater control of young players on that pathway than is currently the case. Consequently, we propose to actively review our relationships with Premiership clubs and our role in developing their young talent.
A clear necessity forced on us by recent events is that we must take steps to ensure that we are in control of our own destiny. In that regard we are delighted to welcome Ben Blanco, former global sponsorship lead at Heineken, as commercial consultant, and Simon Cohen, former chief executive of Leicester Tigers, as our independent member. Having two individuals of such experience and standing in the game will hold us in good stead as we analyse all opportunities ahead, bearing in mind that we now own our commercial and broadcast rights for the next two years at least.
The clubs agreed that a statement outlining these points should be released as soon as practicable.