Always a Wasp
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
61
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: Jersey Reds gone
« on: September 29, 2023, 08:03:40 AM »
The games in serious trouble. How long does it take to come up with a plan? Early comms could have made all the difference to no end of teams. As a slight aside how bleak did the PR photo for the Prem look with two rows of 5 ?
62
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: England v Chile Match Report
« on: September 26, 2023, 07:30:56 PM »Commentator - England have arrived at the World Cup! Jeez no real concept of the opposition.Come on, be fair, it was Chile not Australia.
63
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: The Future
« on: September 26, 2023, 06:25:10 PM »
Yes, a crumb of news would be better than the current updates via companies house director shuffling.
64
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: Wales v Australia and the consequences
« on: September 25, 2023, 03:23:10 PM »
Apparently he?s already attended a zoom interview for the Japan job. So they?ll regress even further. I?ve never seen a team so disorganised and lacking in desire than the Aussies at the moment. Jones?s CV actually has very little on it that he has achieved on his own. He?s a myth.
65
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: The Future
« on: September 23, 2023, 01:07:10 PM »
If you believe Holland he?s only interested in the 5 year option anyway. Which points to another option being pursued beyond that. If you believe him.
66
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: England v Chile Match Report
« on: September 23, 2023, 01:03:35 PM »
Farrell was substituted on 58 minutes with Borthwick clearly furious as he threw a pass. Youngs came on at 9 and 10 to tighten things up and Marcus Smiths stepometer read 7 once the 80 minutes was done.
67
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: The Future
« on: September 18, 2023, 09:12:08 PM »
Most interesting bit there is that he obviously expects us to be playing in some fashion from May 24. In which league??
68
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: BS finally getting called out
« on: September 17, 2023, 01:25:36 PM »
Shouldn?t have taken this long. It?s ineptitude on a large and continued scale. I did chuckle that the fear is ut could affect Englands RWC chances!
69
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: On more pleasant matters. Rugby WC Fra v NZ
« on: September 11, 2023, 08:10:38 AM »
Carley was terrible. Welsh should have had a couple more yellows. Also, if I was North I?d be having a strong word with Biggar about dishing out criticism outside of the changing room.
70
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: On more pleasant matters. Rugby WC Fra v NZ
« on: September 10, 2023, 09:29:59 AM »
You?ve got to give credit for the defensive intensity of England and Fords kicking. Argentina were just terrible. But it was such a dull game.
71
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: On more pleasant matters. Rugby WC Fra v NZ
« on: September 09, 2023, 04:46:29 PM »
Very enjoyable game. The French will be difficult to beat on home soil. The draw means there are going to be some huge group stage games and some less so in the later stages. As an aside what a player Flament has become.
72
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: Jack not even on bench
« on: September 07, 2023, 08:17:39 PM »
It?s the sort of decision that actually makes you want them to lose. It?s becoming clear that Borthwick is way out of his depth and has lost the plot.
73
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: Dobby
« on: September 06, 2023, 07:23:25 PM »
One of the main differences between the cricket and rugby teams is the cricket team can reasonably call Root, Stokes, Bairstow, Anderson and Broad world class performers. Just under half the team. Borthwick is out of his depth but he?s plunged further into the mire as he can probably only call on Ford who maybe able to make a similar claim.
74
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: Dobby
« on: September 04, 2023, 07:10:58 PM »
He didn?t get selected for England because he played for Wasps.
75
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: The Future
« on: September 04, 2023, 07:06:15 PM »
It?s an interesting statement. But surely CH is the current owner, not a former one. Also, if this was anywhere near the truth would it really be Wasps? And then there is the eternal question - where is the cash coming from?