Always a Wasp

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Agosto blond snowpack

Pages: [1] 2
1
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: Big News
« on: August 22, 2022, 07:05:33 PM »
I was curious to know what Christopher Holland's background is and found this from CT : https://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/wasps-appoint-former-mod-man-13508226

Obviously well used to wearing a tin hat and a flak jacket :)

Yes quite an interesting back story if you have the means to look.

Unusual purchase for Lockwood holdings

2
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: Big News
« on: August 22, 2022, 06:43:32 PM »
Sam  -  If you ever met Derek you might well change your mind about this particular millionaire.  I am not being 'crawly' etc;  he is a genuinely nice  person.

Well there was the curious case of a court injunction and an Irish medical practice and of course giving falsified information regarding the clubs accounts which resulted in PW I believe (?) resigning - the reality is Joy Seppala is apparently extremely pleasant and charming and Tim Fisher certainly is

3
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: Big News
« on: August 22, 2022, 06:04:23 PM »
As an aside, does SISU have any separate businesses linked directly to CCFC and if so, how many? I know nothing about business and even less about finance (ask the wife🤣), so I don't find the idea in general being a surprise (to me at least).

Otium operate the football club and is a subsidiary of Sky Blue Sports and Leisure. There is also SBITC (Sky Blues In The Community). I’m not aware of any others.

I think everyone expects that if the unicorn, I mean stadium, is ever built that there will be a propco set up to run it.

I think with Wasps, it was the training centre that surprised me, given statements Vaughan had made about Wasps owning all of it (and the timing of the share transfer) and also Commonwealth Convention Centre Ltd. That is a dormant (but still classed as active) company set up in 2020 and would sound to be, if operational, at odds with Wasps own conferencing operation.

I guess I don’t trust Sisu or multi millionaires particularly when they “owe” ordinary people money.

SBS and L is a shell company with £28m of “owed” but non recoverable funds.  Otium is the club and anyone buying the club only has to purchase Otium

Wasos has a bizarre number of companies including Candmago Holdings within the group and Maltese registered moonstone holdings as the parent company and MGI Fiduciary at the top of the chain

4
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: Big News
« on: August 21, 2022, 07:32:42 PM »
I have to say this, I’m afraid. Shouldn’t Wasps sort out their own financial issues before taking on more expense in the form of players?



I'm not sure not having players is a good way to sort the club. Getting more players in and starting to win is exactly what we need. Along with more conferences, more concerts, and fewer litigious tenants.

Don’t see how conferences and concerts make much money if the last 17 years are anything to go buy and I’m sure this litigious tenant will be in the revenue for version 28 of the growth plan to try and stop the bond holders pressing the button

5
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: Big News
« on: August 21, 2022, 10:50:40 AM »

Telegraph 'Sport:     Headed Worcester Warriors:  Very small piece 'apologising'  -   The headline of our article about Worcester Warriors incorrectly stated they have received a winding-up order.  In fact.  as reported in this article, they have received a winding-up petition and the club have stated that a solution, which would  secure the long-term future of the club, has been approved.   We apologise  for the error in  our headline.  -  The motto of this sorry story is "Never listen  listen to Chinese whispers.  Or newspapers".

It’s hardly Chinese whispers. A winding up petition is when a creditor is requesting an order for non payment. The figure will be significant and the HMRC will have made requests for payment which have been refused

Worcester acknowledge the action is in progress and a court will judge if there is any hope of payment

What nearly always actually happens is the winding up petition leads to administration- this is likely to happen next week with the tax bill believed to be £6 million

6
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: Big News
« on: August 21, 2022, 10:21:02 AM »
Snap

7
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: Big News
« on: August 21, 2022, 10:20:31 AM »
This article is pretty eye watering. The sport got more Covid bail outs than any other

Worcester seem pretty certain to go into administration next week owing £14 m of public money.

https://texttospeech.uk/premier-league-clubs-get-124m-in-taxpayer-money/

8
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: Big News
« on: August 21, 2022, 09:10:30 AM »
Reading the contents of the email circulated to our STHs, there would appear to be a pretty positive view going forward.


The club have done the right thing in keeping stum regarding what has been happening behind the scenes. And doing so to such an extent, that the 4th estate have to clutch at straws and fabricate something that thay think is a headline with an edge.

Commercial side of any business normally operates in isolation

Worcester also have a “business as usual” approach

https://twitter.com/WorcsWarriors/status/1560354903595286529?s=20&t=VUPQr6VrGsTslZJZupTp0w

9
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: Big News
« on: August 18, 2022, 03:42:43 PM »
That’s some hares you’ve just set running there, NWW. I don’t think wuss fans will be happy, Sudbury would be interesting but don’t see it.

The bottom lines are these.

Worcester long since came to the end of the line with regard to additional funds from their owners.

I do not know who 'owns' Sixways, but my guess is that it is mortgaged to the hilt. Thus, to buy the club, somebody has to buy the mortgage. My guess is, right now, if someone approached the mortgage holder with the right deal, that person could pull the rug from under the club and leave it with nowhere to play. The current owners would then be left with a relatively worthless brand and some expensive player contracts. It would all fold in a matter of minutes. The 'brand' would be worth as much as London Welsh is these days. Anybody care to remember that debacle?

Wasps are little better off. Whoever offers to clear the bond debts gets the CBS Arena, leaving Wasps as a debt ridden homeless club.

Leicester are also up for sale, also with large debts, but there I think the owner separately owns the stadium?

The fact is, nobody is stepping up to offer the money, and until the deal is sweet enough, nobody will. Wasps are at a real risk of losing their ground back to CCFC.

Times are hard, and will get harder, and the money men will not give a fig about fans.

The fact that Richardson has now sold all shares in the training ground on the day of the Bond Default is hardly a co-incidence despite the nonsense comment from Wasps when challenged on it

Thats asset protection before default risk.

Wasps RFC are on a sub lease to the Head Lease aren't they? I cannot believe he is not looking at ways of selling the Head Lease to another commercial entity - The council wouldn't object to assignment and for all parties it would be the best outcome

10
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: Commonwealth 7s - Pitch
« on: August 18, 2022, 03:26:14 PM »
But it’s not 20,000 Coventry fans every week in the Championship. Anyway, agree to disagree. The original point was that I hope break clauses have been included by Wasps in order that rent etc can be looked at. SBSam then set off down the rabbit hole of being turfed out. Frankly, I’d be amazed if anything but a minuscule % of CCFC fans would go as far as threatening someone in a Wasps shirt - that’s disgusting if it happens and cannot be condoned.

There is a break clause in the football clubs favour at seven years - why should the rent be looked at? It has been agreed for the term. I believe (not sure) there are different pay structures if promotion or relegation should occur.

11
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: Commonwealth 7s - Pitch
« on: August 18, 2022, 02:52:52 PM »
Wasps need to become more inclusive to CCFC not less

What would you suggest Wasps should be doing that they currently aren't to be more inclusive to CCFC?

Get the pitch ready for the start of the season would have been a help

12
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: Commonwealth 7s - Pitch
« on: August 18, 2022, 02:30:23 PM »
By break clause I meant a chance to look at the rent again. I wouldn’t oversell yourself in terms of “political uproar”. You’ve left the city twice and got the odd mention on regional news and some radio stations. You don’t have a large fan base. 13,000 is about right - not a lot for a one city club. 50,000 would go to Wembley etc once they’ve put their Man U etc shirts away. Robins and Viveash has worked miracles to get you to the Championship but in a business sense CCFC hold none of the aces.

This is pretty throw stones stuff. The club will average 20,000 this season and is in the top 20 average attendances since the war with an overall average similar to similar sized clubs.

I mean seriously how many people in Coventry would care if Wasps went under do you think?
Not many - I’ve never pretended so. Maybe more from the surrounding areas. I’m not throwing stones - that is the reality. They may average 20,000. Some of those will be away fans. Some walk up on the day. There is a hard core of about 10-13,000 fans. That has to be the case as averages were nowhere near that in L1 or L2. It’s not and never has been a football hotbed. Nothing against the fans and not intending to diminish their personal passion for the club but it’s not a club that would cause political uproar.

But its factual nonsense. Even in L1 in 2015 the average was 13,000 and it was the third best supported club in the league.

In The Championship following the H Road the lowest average last time was 15,000 - it was up to 22,000 at one point. Hardly any club averages 13,000 in L2. At Championship level it would easily be 20,000 plus every week and in the Premier League sold out virtually every game.

The atmosphere already in the City believe me is hostile. I do not and will not condone violence but I did witness someone threatened last week in a local shop of all places who had a Wasps shirt on and this type of action would cause mayhem. Wasps need to become more inclusive to CCFC not less

13
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: Commonwealth 7s - Pitch
« on: August 18, 2022, 02:17:32 PM »
Looks like Wasps are renting the training ground - no ownership at all. Wonder who paid to build it

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-coventry-warwickshire-62582325

14
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: Commonwealth 7s - Pitch
« on: August 18, 2022, 02:13:42 PM »
By break clause I meant a chance to look at the rent again. I wouldn’t oversell yourself in terms of “political uproar”. You’ve left the city twice and got the odd mention on regional news and some radio stations. You don’t have a large fan base. 13,000 is about right - not a lot for a one city club. 50,000 would go to Wembley etc once they’ve put their Man U etc shirts away. Robins and Viveash has worked miracles to get you to the Championship but in a business sense CCFC hold none of the aces.

This is pretty throw stones stuff. The club will average 20,000 this season and is in the top 20 average attendances since the war with an overall average similar to similar sized clubs.

I mean seriously how many people in Coventry would care if Wasps went under do you think?

15
Yes, the football club would have 15-20k coming in. But they will be taking the cash for that. The council would, in essence, just be collecting a rent and maybe a % of food etc. On the flip side they have to run the stadium with all the costs that brings. Add to that the fact that they don’t get on well with the football club and it’s not a palatable scenario for them. The football club certainly don’t want to own it and virtually said as much as recently as a couple of weeks ago. So CCFC’s best hope is that things carry on as they are.

Sorry this is just not correct

You seem confused with the Head Lease and ACL

ACL will not be owned by the Council. ACL will be in administration and run by administrators until a buyer is actually found.

The rent is paid to ACL

The council will have the lease returned to them and would obviously then seek to sell the Head Lease back to the new owner of ACL 2006 LTD.

You make too much of this. When wasps crash and burn the loan goes with it. It would then attract IEC type organisations or owners who want a potential Premier League Football Club

Wasps are a small company and cannot manage a stadium of this diveristy - it lacks expertise and finance - it would be better having someone with that experience now for all parties and the City of Cioventry

Pages: [1] 2