Always a Wasp

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
All of that actually (& rather surprisingly given the quote "Explaining that their plan "seeks to increase rugby's accessibility and relevance among a broader, younger fan base by embracing on-field innovation and re-imagined presentation of the sport with compelling storytelling") makes some sense with the exception of:

Scrum from a free kick - I don't see why a team with a dominant scrum shouldn't be allowed to capitalise on that.

20 Min red card -The issue is that red cards that are mandated for dangerous play are being applied to errors or mistakes rather than malicious action & ruining too many games. Fix that problem rather than allow a replacement after 20 mins

Marks from restarts - a long restart with a decent chase is just as contestable as a shorter one & shows more skill. Why remove that?



Because dominant teams then get a penalty just for being better at scrummaging. One of my pet hates.


Long restarts will still be contestable, this new rule will speed up the game by negating somewhat the boring caterpillar at the ruck.


Looks like some common sense ideas to me.
2
All of that actually (& rather surprisingly given the quote "Explaining that their plan "seeks to increase rugby's accessibility and relevance among a broader, younger fan base by embracing on-field innovation and re-imagined presentation of the sport with compelling storytelling") makes some sense with the exception of:

Scrum from a free kick - I don't see why a team with a dominant scrum shouldn't be allowed to capitalise on that.

20 Min red card -The issue is that red cards that are mandated for dangerous play are being applied to errors or mistakes rather than malicious action & ruining too many games. Fix that problem rather than allow a replacement after 20 mins

Marks from restarts - a long restart with a decent chase is just as contestable as a shorter one & shows more skill. Why remove that?
3

Rugby introduces three new laws, and trials six more

Fan-focused changes will reduce kick-tennis, outlaw the crocodile roll and remove option of taking a scrum from a free-kick
Charlie Morgan, Senior Rugby Writer 9 May 2024 ? 8:37pm
 

Teams will no longer be allowed to choose a scrum from a free-kick under new laws to be rolled out across the game next season, with 20-minute red cards and shot-clocks for scrums and line-outs also to be trialled.

World Rugby confirmed on Thursday afternoon three permanent law tweaks that will come into force from July 1 of this year. Explaining that their plan ?seeks to increase rugby?s accessibility and relevance among a broader, younger fanbase by embracing on-field innovation and reimagined presentation of the sport with compelling storytelling,? the governing body also announced several trials to take place at this summer?s Under-20 World Championship that could be rolled out across the game next year.

The first immediate change will see scrums outlawed from free-kicks, with teams required to kick or tap them to speed up the game. South Africa notably called for scrums from free-kicks following marks in their own 22 during the knockout stages of last year?s World Cup.

The second change concerns kicks in open play, and the clause popularly known as ?Dupont Law?. From July 1, it will no longer be possible for a player to be put onside when an opponent catches the ball and either runs five metres or passes the ball. In a bid to reduce the amount of kick tennis, offside players must now retreat.

Finally, the ?crocodile roll? ? the act of twisting a defending player off their feet in the tackle area ? will be outlawed. Christian Day, the current head of the Rugby Players? Association, has been campaigning against the ?crocodile roll? for more than two years and was an influential voice.

The changes are unlikely to end with the three laws introduced from July 1, given several new trials have been announced. Twenty-minute red cards, whereby the offending player can be replaced after that period rather than permanently excluded and which have been promoted by Super Rugby competitions over recent years, are part of a suite of six ?closed law trials? that will be used in World Rugby competitions, including the World U20 Championship, over the coming year.

There will also be a trial of automatic bans for certain offences in a concerted move from World Rugby to streamline the disciplinary process to avoid the confusion and inconsistency that has marred the game in recent years.

The 20-minute red cards will be offset by a revised on- and off-field sanctions process with suspensions attached to offences. Days of mitigation for good behaviour at hearings or for previously clean records could be gone.

Foul play, where a player has ?attempted to affect a legal rugby action? will bring about a two-week ban. Aggravated foul play, involving ?highly reckless? actions such as tucked arms, shoulder-charges and spear tackles, will be worth four-week suspensions. Mitigation will only come into force if there is an appeal.

Teams in the U20 World Championships and in other World Rugby competitions such as the Pacific Nations Cup and WXV will have 30 seconds to set scrums and line-outs. The shot clock for a conversion will be reduced from 90 seconds to 60.

There is to be added protection for scrum-halves at the bases of scrums, rucks and mauls, with the offside line for defending scrum-halves moved back to the middle of the scrum.

Players will be able to mark the ball inside their own 22 from a restart, which has been introduced to encourage short restarts and discourage caterpillar rucks, which teams often use to clear the ball down-field. Finally, mauls can only stop once before the ball has to be played and, if line-outs are uncontested, then throws cannot be called as ?not straight?.

?Changes will add to rugby?s entertainment factor?

The trial laws announced this week were discussed at the Shape of the Game conference in February and findings will be presented to the World Rugby Council in November. From there, they could be rolled out more widely. They could be implemented in earlier competitions if participating unions choose to introduce them.

?I would like to thank my colleagues from across the game for embracing the spirit of this comprehensive review of rugby?s entertainment factor,? said Bill Beaumont, the World Rugby chairman. ?With calendar certainty, including new competitions and all men?s and women?s Rugby World Cups set through to 2033, our major events are defined, our content set.

?There is unprecedented long-term certainty, and this work is vital to ensuring that the on-field product is befitting of the opportunities that we have in front of us, a superb sport that is enjoyable to play and watch and helps attract a new generation to get into rugby.

?Personally, I believe that the law amendments and suite of closed trials will add to the entertainment factor. As with all trials, we will comprehensively review their effectiveness and take feedback from across the game. The revised red card sanction process is such an example, and it is important that we trial, assess and make definitive decisions based on data and feedback.?

Among other areas being monitored by World Rugby is the tackle height of the elite game, which has been lowered at lower levels around the globe, and the number of replacements that are allowed in any given game.

At a glance: rugby's law changes

Scrums scrapped at free-kicks

Teams awarded a free-kick will no longer be able to assemble a scrum. Goodbye to the Springboks? World Cup flex. Could teams with a weak set piece cynically concede free-kicks at scrums, though? A second free-kick for the same offence does yield a penalty.

Dupont Law scrapped

A clause in the offside law essentially allowed players to hold offside positions during kick-tennis rallies before rushing up-field once an opponent ran five metres or passed the ball. This is now closed, and players must retreat from offside positions.

Crocodile roll banned

Attacking players have been able to twist opponents away from the ball and to the floor at breakdowns. This is is now outlawed.

Twenty-minute red cards (trial)

Instead of traditional, permanent dismissals for red cards, the offending player will be allowed to be replaced after 20 minutes. Super Rugby has used this ploy, which is thought to be largely unpopular among northern hemisphere nations, in recent years.

Thirty-second shot clocks for scrums and lineouts (trial)

This aims to speed up the assembly of set pieces. Shot-clocks for conversions will also be reduced to 30 seconds, bringing them in line with the time limit for penalty goals.

Marks from restarts (trial)

Previously, receiving teams have not been allowed to call for a mark from long restarts. Now they will be able to. The aim here is to mitigate caterpillar rucks, which are often set up from restarts, and to encourage more shorter, contestable kicks.

Scrum-half protection (trial)

Following on from a trial in Major League Rugby across the Atlantic, scrum-halves will be given more space at rucks, mauls and scrums. At scrums, the offside line for the defending scrum-half will be moved back to the middle of the set piece.



4
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: Salary Cap Impacting?
« Last post by coddy on May 09, 2024, 12:50:28 PM »
I?m sure it was Lam who was peddling the lunatic idea of increasing the cap not so long ago.


He was, how times change - https://amp.theguardian.com/sport/2023/apr/13/salary-cap-killing-the-reputation-of-the-premiership-says-bristols-lam

5
Potentially a great asset in the new Wasp set up. Knows the league and players very well!,,,


He would certainly get my vote, ex Wasps player and Championship winning Head Coach. What's not to like?
6
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: Ex Wasps signing for new clubs
« Last post by baldpaul101 on May 09, 2024, 10:01:25 AM »
Tom West signs for Saints.
Strange that he doesn't seem to have played much at either Tiger or Sarries.
7
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: Salary Cap Impacting?
« Last post by Shugs on May 08, 2024, 11:05:46 PM »
I?m sure it was Lam who was peddling the lunatic idea of increasing the cap not so long ago.
8
Potentially a great asset in the new Wasp set up. Knows the league and players very well!,,,
10
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Salary Cap Impacting?
« Last post by Neils on May 08, 2024, 09:53:41 AM »

Premiership?s richest club Bristol Bears? spending to fall well short of salary cap


Director of rugby Pat Lam explains that club will move forward with smaller squad after Premiership clubs adapt to new financial landscape


Bristol Bears will be well under the increased Premiership salary cap ceiling next season despite the riches of Steve Lansdown, their billionaire owner, because of a forecast reduction in central funding to follow the new broadcast deal.

Pat Lam will bid farewell to 17 players over the summer, including Kyle Sinckler, as part of what he called a ?re-setting? process that will lean on experienced leaders such as Ellis Genge, Steven Lutatua and AJ MacGinty to guide a relatively young group.

Lam explained that a 10-team league has left him unable to assure players of game-time. However, another factor has been the renewed broadcast deal with TNT Sports. As things stand, it is expected that clubs will be around ?1 million worse off from television money over the next two seasons, with a view to a more lucrative, longer-term broadcast deal being secured after that period.

The shortfall will be offset by enhanced support from the Rugby Football Union as part of the new professional game partnership, as revealed by Telegraph Sport last month, but Lam said that Bristol, historically regarded as big-spenders in the days of Charles Piutau and Semi Radradra, have reassessed and plan to be some way short of the ?6.4 million salary cap.
?I don?t think we?re going to be up to ?5 million ? that?s fine?

?We?ve got a really exciting group coming through and we?re definitely going to be a smaller squad,? Lam explained on Tuesday. ?We won?t spend to the cap either. At the moment, I don?t think we?re going to be up to ?5 million ? and that?s fine.?

Lam labelled the approach as one of consolidation, stressing that Lansdown was still willing to commit funds.

?There?s no doubt Steve could put more money in if he wanted to, buy why would you?? Lam said. ?The product is really good, but the other side has to pick up as well. If anything, the money that he committed to us is still there. It hasn?t changed. The same amount. What has happened is that it?s the other side that has fallen down ? the TV deal. Every club is going to feel it.

?I believe Steve is testing us; saying ?can you run the club properly?? We?ve been doing that now. It just makes us get everything in order. We?re consolidating when, sure, he could add more money to it. Remember, this decision was made when news of this deal came around Christmas time. If anything. it?s sharpened our focus to make sure it?s not about the individuals, it?s about the right people to play as a team, the right people in the organisation to be efficient and purposeful, and get your jobs done really well.
?We?re no different to the other businesses Steve has?

?We?ve got too much fat on all the different edges ? and we?re no different to the other hundreds of businesses Steve has, or is looking to invest in. That?s why he?s very successful in what he does. I?ve found it really liberating working with Gavin Marshall [Bristol Sport CEO] and Tom Tainton [Bears COO], to work it through. It?s a great exercise for us.?

Over-reliance on a single benefactor has been shown to be fraught with danger and Bristol are evidently eager to avoid that; or at least to work towards a more sustainable approach.

?Sometimes it is ?oh this?ll be ok as Steve will put money in?,? Lam continued. ?He looked after us very well in Covid, and now it?s our turn to make sure that we look after his investment. I think we?ve shown in the last 10-11 weeks, we?re making huge improvements. That will continue next year.

?It has made us look at recruitment, bringing in the right people, let?s look at some gems. We?ve proven ourselves to be able to find gems in the Championship and in BUCS [British Universities and Colleges Sport] ? guys who are hungry.?
?We have a responsibility to make sure we make good decisions?

The decision to raise the salary cap from ?5 million to ?6.4 million for the 2024-25 campaign has divided the Premiership. While some clubs have voiced opposition, Rob Baxter, the Exeter Chiefs director of rugby, outlined his support, even if his club will also be below the limit. Lam, used to skinnier budgets from his time at Connacht, insisted that clubs would need to be disciplined.

?Put [the cap] at ?10 million; it doesn?t mean we?re going to go to it,? he said. ?The onus is on financial directors. Where I used to work I would say ?can I get this?? and they went ?no we don?t have that money? or ?yes you can, but this is all you?ve got?, rather than ?yeah buy that, we?ll find that money somewhere else?.

?All those clubs that went bust, I would look at the financial people, and the decision to spend money they didn?t have. Gambling. Put the cap at ?10 million, and if a club wants to go there, sure, but most clubs won?t if they?re clever as they?ll go bust.

?We have a responsibility to make sure we make very good decisions to be a successful rugby club and work in the means we can afford. What that means is we, not Steve. Our goal from the beginning was to be less reliant on a financial backer. Steve has been brilliant for us, and we were tracking [well], which has earnt us the trust and reputation to look after us during the Covid time.

?Now we?re getting back it?s ?let?s consolidate, look where we?re at?. Who knows what is around the corner so let?s focus on what we do, and be efficient in what we do and still try to be successful in what we do.?
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10