Always a Wasp

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - mike909

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 162
31
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: Time for positivity.
« on: April 10, 2023, 06:00:16 PM »

The numbers of people here, not just posting, but those who only read as well, are massively down.


For me - I post less as there's no news.....and I look to see if there's any news. It is really poor form iro fans and I was hoping there would be as chance to get to a game next season - regardless of my health!

32
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: Ex Wasps signing for new clubs
« on: April 08, 2023, 11:39:33 AM »

I absolutely hate Tom Willis going to Sarries, who will no doubt claim that he was very average but they were able to turn him into a great player.

They can claim that - but they only signed him because of him saving some of his best games against Sarries.....

33
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: Time for positivity.
« on: March 25, 2023, 10:16:04 AM »
Whose ground is in the backdrop. It it Gloucester?

That is the north east corner of the Glaws ground behind them.

34
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: England today
« on: March 19, 2023, 05:06:58 PM »
I don?t know how the autumn team can look much different really. I?m wracking my brains thinking who could be involved that isn?t at the moment. Ford? Pearson? Quirke? Lawes? T Willis? Daly? We?re in a poor player cycle at the moment.
It may be that with a few alterations, the RWC team could be similar to the Ireland 23. I did think that the RWC was a write off - but given the draw, it's probably worth a punt with a lower risk selection. Leaving the line in the sand to the 2024 6Ns.

But it wouldn't be necessarily the same starting XV. I'd hope that there are queries around 8,9,10, and how the centres will operate. Back three prob looked better with Watson at 15....

But we ought to make the SF. And then it's game on. But even if that was the case, it ought to not indicate that there isn't a lot of work to do. And looking towards a future squad that might play positively towards 2027.

35
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: England today
« on: March 19, 2023, 11:43:20 AM »
An odd game, all in all. The focus and effort was better and whilst not bringing much, ball in hand, the experience of the 10/12/13 meant a better defensive performance. Probably lucky on the scoreline that Ireland were showing nerves. And Willis was excellent and involved and Watson filled in like a 15 with pace....

But not sure  - as others have said - why Smith wasn't given the last 20 to see if he could compound their nerves.

Have little idea about what the team will look like come Autumn.

36
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: England today
« on: March 17, 2023, 12:52:13 PM »
He's not looked like having any form for ages. I wonder if he's lost condition/pace such that he falls between two stools. He was supposed to be trying to lose weight to help his joints etc - but seemed to have lost that power which made him dangerous in the 13 channel.

Was still going well enough in 2020 6Ns especially vs Wales R4 and Ireland R3 until getting a red vs Wales. Subbed alter 16m vs France in R1 and missed R2

Not played 6Ns since.

37
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: England today
« on: March 17, 2023, 11:42:47 AM »
England today - again...A back to the future selection. Whilst great to see Arundel on the wing - Farrell, Manu and Slade fail my "dynamism test" and with the slow SH too.

Ireland won't likely be surprised what a Farrell/Manu 10/12 are likely to do....And whilst this midfield did play together before....it was 2019 6Ns and RWC QF. But the team was moving forwards and Manu was in good fitness and form.

Seems more of a "not lose by too many" selection rather than anything else.

38
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: England today
« on: March 15, 2023, 11:36:52 AM »
Jones took advantage of having half plus of one clubs pack selected - that was especially useful when it included an on form BV and Maro and Kruis. Took a lot of requirements for coordination out of the way, increased with the hooker too.

Trouble was - when your plan is "EA's plus" and they go off form....

I hadn't actually noticed before - but the last 6Ns that England were doing ok was 2020. The last season that Kruis was available. And the last that a pack was able to deliver to a "RWC Final - a - like" backline.

What was stunning was the drop off in form and results immediately after. It really suggests that without most of an inform EA's pack to select, England were not at the races - prob caused by their relegation and lack of hard game time.

You can see it in the 2021 6Ns game vs Scotland - off the pace and not in a game they only lost 12-6. Got out thought in Cardiff and dismantled in Dublin. Oddly winning vs a France team that ought to have won.

So - England's successes seemed indeed based upon the EA's being like a "mini England" training team avoiding the need to change too much, and the 10/12 of the U-20's team. 

Makes Borthwick's task all the harder. As there isn't really that backbone of England qual EA's.....in form and able to support the England team.

39
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: England today
« on: March 13, 2023, 01:33:17 PM »
Headline in Grauniad that Lawrence out with hamstring, allows possibility of Manu returning....A fit and firing Manu, at 13, not 12, is not a difficult pick...however.....


40
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: England today
« on: March 12, 2023, 05:21:44 PM »
Having seen Ireland win vs a more than decent Scotland....I'm rather concerned about England going to Dublin.....

41
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: England today
« on: March 12, 2023, 12:20:02 PM »
100% Shugs - but those who could be those in a changed group can grow into those players. Jonny W was only potential even in 99. But we do need patience and the guts to go with younger players.

But whilst these things are cyclical - somehow, Jones managed to take a better than average team from the RWC, maintain their form into 2020 and then allow terrible form/play/performances to kick in with no response. There needs to be some questions asked.

The 2021 6Ns was the most disappointing. Taken apart by Scotland, out thought by Wales and rolled over by Ireland. Vs Wales was a near RWC Final team....Jones has a reputation for losing the changing room and the stories of sausages, his time with both Japan and Oz and things like his cast off of Yarde ("how are you doing?" "Long weekend, quite tired" "No room for you here then..") or v similar. The casting off of Malins etc etc And that sort of "management" of people rarely ends well. And here we are.....

42
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: England today
« on: March 12, 2023, 10:52:30 AM »
Good post Wombles. But linking to mine who are you rebuilding with? Backs wise you?d pick out Smith/Ford and Steward. When you watch the prem there are no 12?s. All of the SH?s are similar in their averageness. We have more options at 13 and maybe a slight increase in quality but still I?d probably class as ?workaday?. On the wings? Arundell has promise. You are then into the likes of Watson, May, Nowell, Cockanasiga, Malins. All of whom range from average to adequate. Forwards wise it?s even worse but don?t want to repeat my earlier rant! English rugby is in a dire place and to rebuild you need appropriate materials.

It's a hard one Shugs - it's too late for the RWC, surely - but looking towards a team that could do the business in the 6N's and win more than 2 of 5 perhaps a bit of clear out might be best, enabling a line to drawn, post Jones.

Scrumwise, at LH, Genge has promise but needs to knuckle down - time for a break? West is playing for Tigers today and VRR looks good too and Rodd. Frankly, hooker needs a clear out. No George or LCD again and look towards Walker. TH Heyes plus....   SR Chessum and Martin are both good enough, though prob not together....Ditto Nick I. Backrow, Wills x 2 and Earl for starters. Curry looks lost, Ludlam not good enough and Ludlow might be worth a punt.

Backline is more awkward. Mitchell and Quirke @ 9, Smith and Grayson? 12.....Kelly at Tigers is well regarded, and Lawrence at 13 with ball is excellent even in a poor Bath side. Worth the time. Back three, Steward is ok. FH is potentially a problem if want more than a younger Brown...Wings - Arundell, OHC, Radwan and the rest.

But - it needs a clear our of pretty much everyone who was a Jones' preference......And then be patient.

43
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: England today
« on: March 11, 2023, 09:52:48 PM »
Analysis of that is remarkably simple. They were just better everywhere and in every discipline. England don?t have an international second row. Not sure how many anonymous performances Itoje can be allowed. There were inept, disinterested performances everywhere. You look to the bench and see Cole, Vunipola, Farrell, Ribbans. That?s the real rub. We aren?t missing anyone. There is no one else. We?re just not very good.
All of that. I'd only add It was a very similar game to the first 20 odd of France vs Scotland - pace, power and intensity that put them way up very early doors. That game differed as France had to defend vs a more than decent Scotland attack and so could not afford to take liberties. Scotland were decent at breakdown too and provided possession. But France were just too good.

Face such a start and have a bit of a "meh" day and not be as good as you'd have hoped you were and you'd get today's result. France were better than vs Scotland - but Scotland were a bigger challenge too.

Whilst the score was an outlier - it wasn't a performance that we hadn't seen before in each of the last two 6N's, and more than once. I suppose the longer term query is to ask how those players levels fell off so markedly and so quickly post 2020.

Taking a player out of the squad - how did BV go from probably near best 8 in world rugby to so poor in such a short time? And that goes for most of the EA's players.

My answer is Jones' regime became corrosive and the EA's got found out.

44
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: England today
« on: March 11, 2023, 05:29:29 PM »
Ouch. That's a lesson. If France maintain concentration this is going to get rather nasty...

45
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: More Financial Trouble?
« on: March 10, 2023, 12:18:42 PM »
The simple fact is that while there are individuals willing to spaff millions up the wall to indulge their hobby the game has a problem. The English game is bust, as is the Welsh. The sugar daddy clubs have created a scenario where they can survive but will have no-one to play. One of the best things that came from new Wasps was that they were looking for institutional investment. We also tried to break the model with our Ricoh move. We?re trying to do the right things. The English game itself needs a fundamental reset as I don?t think a 4 team prem and a 20 team championship works!

There are a variety of problems, but pro sport has always required either no rules (effectively) like Prem football - I support Fulham - it's where my family was from - and we have to compete against the Man City's that can afford one player the same value as our squad. All based on marketisation and vast sugar daddy funding. And filling grounds and TV rights. That means it's up to every club how it ends up.

If you have restrictions - like that we've got and had for Prem rugby, that needs clubs to be cooperative and basically honest....Whilst as someone who audited public accounts as a trainee (I stopped asap!) that needed organisations to be basically honest - or they got sat on by masses of expensive people until reality was discovered - as far as possible.

But to audit a salary cap for a rugby club, determined to by pass controls - would be impossible. Easy to audit the salaries and expenses paid by the "club" - virtually impossible to do anything about side deals that aren't about sponsorship (i.e. a Red Bull scrum cap). And here we are....

So - fundamentally, rugby in England will need all participating clubs to be wanting to cooperate and commit to open books and not doing side deals. And I'm not sure that's likely.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 162