Always a Wasp

Author Topic: Ryan Mills absence explained and Elliott Stooke update  (Read 4083 times)

Neils

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14808
  • Wasps Rugby Fan
    • View Profile
Re: Ryan Mills absence explained and Elliott Stooke update
« Reply #30 on: July 19, 2022, 06:27:44 PM »
Thanks for the uninitiated.
Let me tell you something cucumber

Shugs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4425
  • Wasps Rugby Fan
    • View Profile
Re: Ryan Mills absence explained and Elliott Stooke update
« Reply #31 on: July 19, 2022, 06:33:10 PM »
Yes, but it will remain slightly misaligned [and a bit rotated]. 30 years ago we would have taken it back to theatre.
Is the prognosis that he will be unaffected playing wise?

backdoc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1193
  • Wasps Rugby Fan
    • View Profile
Re: Ryan Mills absence explained and Elliott Stooke update
« Reply #32 on: July 19, 2022, 09:19:22 PM »
You can't be certain, so all internal fixation should be perfect or as near as possible.

For the rest of us, a small malalignment would make no difference. Otherwise rotation/shortening at the ankle is bad news.

I have operated on top level athletes for 30 + years and I can see no excuse for anything other than a perfect technical result. There is usually one problem to address, in a fit and healthy patient, and there is no time pressure.

Anyone care to read about Casiraghi from Chelsea can see how it works in private practice in London. I think the payout was > £20 million.

westwaleswasp

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2019
  • Wasps Rugby Fan
    • View Profile
Re: Ryan Mills absence explained and Elliott Stooke update
« Reply #33 on: July 19, 2022, 09:46:06 PM »
20 million, wow. Astonishing, yet believable.

That is half a bond repayment or a loan for stadium upgrade ;)

Shugs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4425
  • Wasps Rugby Fan
    • View Profile
Re: Ryan Mills absence explained and Elliott Stooke update
« Reply #34 on: July 20, 2022, 08:59:54 AM »
You can't be certain, so all internal fixation should be perfect or as near as possible.

For the rest of us, a small malalignment would make no difference. Otherwise rotation/shortening at the ankle is bad news.

I have operated on top level athletes for 30 + years and I can see no excuse for anything other than a perfect technical result. There is usually one problem to address, in a fit and healthy patient, and there is no time pressure.

Anyone care to read about Casiraghi from Chelsea can see how it works in private practice in London. I think the payout was > £20 million.
Fascinating insight albeit if I’m reading it correctly it is a bit troubling for Stooke as the expected perfection doesn’t seem to have been achieved?