VV, that was indeed a good post, however I don’t think there was any inkling of further legal action from CCFC leading up to the bond redemption date.
Some of your recollections about rent levels sound familiar. Sisu undoubtedly handled thing both badly and wrongly from the start.
If a company (and stress the if) end up financially penalised because another company has not abided by a contract, is it that unreasonable to pursue some recompense - and none of us know whether that will happen - we are working on a balance of probabilities given some history. I was very angry about the pitch situation and will only see two home games by the end of September and I do think Wasps handled it very badly.
If a contract obligation has been broken there will be stipulated remedies and these may or may not be financial.
In this case I would expect any commercial director and lawyer worth their salt to have limited those remedies to at most direct out of pocket expenses and for ccfc to have had an obligation to mitigate any losses as soon as they were notified.
But as we have no idea what's in the contract this is only idle speculation while we wait for the season to start and as I've said, I trust Wasps' commercial team to be all over these sorts of issues given the history.
Always a Wasp