Always a Wasp

Author Topic: Worcester  (Read 25201 times)

Heathen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3094
    • View Profile
Re: Worcester
« Reply #15 on: August 29, 2022, 10:14:37 PM »
The fact it was dismissed immediately suggests our owners aren't panicking.

Raggs, I agree with that.

ardenwasp

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 67
  • Wasps Rugby Fan
    • View Profile
Re: Worcester
« Reply #16 on: August 29, 2022, 10:21:19 PM »
I’m sure Worcester Sauce would have been delighted with a merger.

WonkyWasp

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5916
  • Wasps Rugby Fan
    • View Profile
Re: Worcester
« Reply #17 on: August 29, 2022, 10:40:13 PM »
Probably have apoplexy.

MarleyWasp

  • Guest
Re: Worcester
« Reply #18 on: August 29, 2022, 10:41:37 PM »
I’m sure Worcester Sauce would have been delighted with a merger.

Ironically this isn't the first time, nor was the move to Coventry the first time someone looked at moving Wasps to the West Midlands. In 2001 when QPR and Loftus Road PLC went into administration, Cecil Duckworth was preparing a bid for Wasps, mainly to buy his way into the Premiership. Ultimately Chris Wright bought Wasps from Loftus Road PLC and the rest is history.

westwaleswasp

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2011
  • Wasps Rugby Fan
    • View Profile
Re: Worcester
« Reply #19 on: August 30, 2022, 02:45:48 AM »
Have to say, Worcester Wasps has a ring to it.

JonnyD

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1403
  • Wasps Rugby Fan
    • View Profile
Re: Worcester
« Reply #20 on: August 30, 2022, 04:31:22 AM »
Have to say, Worcester Wasps has a ring to it.

Probably better than Coventry Warriors

Bloke in North Dorset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2465
  • Wasps Rugby Fan
    • View Profile
Re: Worcester
« Reply #21 on: August 30, 2022, 10:21:13 AM »
Have to say, Worcester Wasps has a ring to it.

Probably better than Coventry Warriors
I suppose Coventry Crusaders would be a bit controversial.

Neils

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14737
  • Wasps Rugby Fan
    • View Profile
Re: Worcester
« Reply #22 on: August 30, 2022, 10:45:47 AM »
Coventry Cathedrals would be religiousist
Let me tell you something cucumber

SBSam

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 278
  • Wasps Rugby Fan
    • View Profile
Re: Worcester
« Reply #23 on: August 30, 2022, 10:50:53 AM »
The fact it was dismissed immediately suggests our owners aren't panicking.

Or at least recognition that merging two organisations with financial problems creates one organisation with ginormous financial problems.

Neils

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14737
  • Wasps Rugby Fan
    • View Profile
Re: Worcester
« Reply #24 on: August 30, 2022, 11:11:00 AM »
The fact it was dismissed immediately suggests our owners aren't panicking.

Or at least recognition that merging two organisations with financial problems creates one organisation with ginormous financial problems.

Nope the first comment is somewhat closer to the mark.
Let me tell you something cucumber

InBetweenWasp

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1008
  • Wasps Rugby Fan
    • View Profile
Re: Worcester
« Reply #25 on: August 30, 2022, 11:34:13 AM »
The fact it was dismissed immediately suggests our owners aren't panicking.

Or at least recognition that merging two organisations with financial problems creates one organisation with ginormous financial problems.

Nope the first comment is somewhat closer to the mark.

Both are probably true.  The question would be 'Whats in it for Wasps?' and the answer to that is unclear.  Is there a benefit we could think of? - I can't.  It wouldn't resolve our own financial issues, if anything, it would be a further burden as SBSam has suggested.

SBSam

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 278
  • Wasps Rugby Fan
    • View Profile
Re: Worcester
« Reply #26 on: August 30, 2022, 12:26:13 PM »
Coventry Cathedrals would be religiousist

And cultural misappropriation.

SBSam

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 278
  • Wasps Rugby Fan
    • View Profile
Re: Worcester
« Reply #27 on: August 30, 2022, 12:31:12 PM »
The fact it was dismissed immediately suggests our owners aren't panicking.

Or at least recognition that merging two organisations with financial problems creates one organisation with ginormous financial problems.

Nope the first comment is somewhat closer to the mark.

Both are probably true.  The question would be 'Whats in it for Wasps?' and the answer to that is unclear.  Is there a benefit we could think of? - I can't.  It wouldn't resolve our own financial issues, if anything, it would be a further burden as SBSam has suggested.

I didn’t have an agenda when I made that comment. The NHS has done this loads of times, hoping to solve things by merging 2 Trusts with big financial issues to create 1 Trust with huge financial issues.

I can’t see many benefits to Wasps if operating out of Coventry, a few more attendees perhaps. 

Rossm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7442
  • Hey, Slow Down.
    • View Profile
Re: Worcester
« Reply #28 on: August 30, 2022, 12:32:54 PM »
Breaking Warriors update: Tweet from Marcello Cossali-Francis.

I have been informed that the August payroll (due tomorrow) “at this moment” will not be fulfilled for staff and players.

According to the owners, this is due to the accounts being frozen. The overall outcome for the club remains uncertain.


That sounds a bit grim.
SLAVA UKRAINI!
HEROYAM SLAVA!

Neils

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14737
  • Wasps Rugby Fan
    • View Profile
Re: Worcester
« Reply #29 on: August 30, 2022, 12:41:15 PM »
Breaking Warriors update: Tweet from Marcello Cossali-Francis.

I have been informed that the August payroll (due tomorrow) “at this moment” will not be fulfilled for staff and players.

According to the owners, this is due to the accounts being frozen. The overall outcome for the club remains uncertain.


That sounds a bit grim.

Jeez not good for the players and staff.
Let me tell you something cucumber