Having now watched the whole game on repeat - its a hard game to judge. We won, at least in part, due to some individual brilliance - and brilliant it was too. What would worry me is that with possession, and with Searle on the pitch, our half backs and Jimmy didn't look able to often make ground or space. We had a lot of possession, and too often, more in the first half, we tended to go sideways or backwards with little evidence of structure. Second half was at times better - but not a lot.
Forwards, scrum was decent. Ref was random at scrum time, but it settled. Our lineout was average at best. Good at the breakdown and it was good to see Brookes and others being brought into play a bit more. Forwards created a lot of possession, but we seemed too often unable to make the most of it and were too often slow from 9.
Box and kicking from the 22 seemed unplanned. Our kick chase seemed to provide too much to do to contest. The kicks from the 22 were too often aimless. We failed too often to bring the back three into the game with ball in hand. I was never convinced that when the ball came to the back three, there was a plan to go forwards/kick/kick to touch.
Probably one of those games that could have gone either way. It was very nice that it went our way - but we have a lot to work on if we are to look like a team playing to a plan for more of the 80 mins. Can't criticise the commitment or enthusiasm nor the pure joy at the win, but I hope in the cold light of day, we've seen that as a step forwards, but an incremental one rather than a stride.