Looking back and having read a lot of comments elsewhere re the game - it does appear that many fans seem to think this was some sort of indicator of England going well.....
Whilst only having the official stats made available by England, what is v clear is that England have been a) blunt, ball in hand, not making clean breaks or offloading (we were at 50% of Wales yesterday) and b) not nailing our set piece
Whilst by no means a Billy or Mako fan, what they did (when fit...) provide to England was metres, offloads and defenders beaten. Positives that have been in shorter supply when England don't have such players. And that seems to mean the backline is not ever playing off front foot ball.
Again, part of that success was utilising the back three - and again, the selections yesterday were not anything like Watson, May and even Daly in terms of go forwards. In selecting Nowell, Malins and Steward, we really have little to fear in terms of pace and with Lawes, Dombrandt and Curry - we have no offloaders, just players that run into contact.
That we've picked a 13 at 12 again, just shows that we've not really planned for when Farrell (for all his issues) isn't fit, and our backline, too often looked like they'd met in the car park.
So - we'd be there with the better teams with a) sorting the set piece - surely easy enough? b) picking a backrow with a plan other than "lets run straight into contact" c) Look to someone to play 12......d) play pace in the back three.
This sort of performance was exactly what was expected with trying to play "hybrid" players, confusing players with roles and shirt numbers and thinking there is some sort of master plan if you are not going to compete at breakdown and do the basics.