Always a Wasp

Author Topic: Worcester  (Read 25726 times)

JonnyD

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1403
  • Wasps Rugby Fan
    • View Profile
Re: Worcester
« Reply #75 on: September 05, 2022, 08:34:34 AM »
Said it on a previous thread in a previous week on a similar thread but it’s time for what happens on the pitch to do the talking now.

Big responsibility on Blackett, his team and the squad now to take charge of what our column inches discuss now.
I don’t normally comment on posts discussing bonds, debt etc but my very naive view is that if the wasps product is good and can be sustained over the next few years and it’s putting bums on seats then then the rest should sort itself out.
Thank you yet again Derek and friends, Lee… over to you

SBSam

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 278
  • Wasps Rugby Fan
    • View Profile
Re: Worcester
« Reply #76 on: September 05, 2022, 10:29:14 PM »
Daily Telegraph
Worcester co-owners hit back at MPs' call to put club into administration
Colin Goldring and Jason Whittingham claim three sets of buyers are in discussions to take over the Premiership club

By Charlie Morgan, Senior Rugby Writer5 September 2022 • 8:13pm
Colin Goldring and Jason Whittingham, Worcester Warriors’ co-owners, have hit back at local MPs for calling for the club to be put into administration, claiming that a potential buyer is “moving at an especially rapid pace”.

This comes after another dramatic day on which it emerged that Worcester face relegation if they go down the administration route because the Rugby Football Union’s deadline for the new season has now passed.

The MPs speaking out were Robin Walker, Harriett Baldwin, Rachel Maclean and Mark Garnier, whose constituencies are in the area surrounding Sixways, and they had implored the Department of Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) to intervene.

Their belief is that immediate administration would be the best course of action to keep Worcester in the top flight. But what has clouded the issue is that the RFU's threshold for the current season to begin is understood to have been last Saturday, September 3 – even though the Premiership does not start until the coming weekend.

Under the regulations, a club can be docked 35 points if they go into administration between seasons. If they go into administration during a season, though, automatic relegation is on the cards.

Worcester could be able to apply for their plight to be considered as a “no-fault insolvency event”. In this case, the RFU would have the freedom to waive any punishment. Were Goldring and Whittingham to find a buyer and complete a sale without the club going into liquidation or administration, Warriors would not be relegated.

The four MPs, in a joint statement, said that “enough is enough” and that “rapid action” was vital to secure top-flight rugby union for their local Premiership club amid “appalling mismanagement”.

Worcester’s co-owners responded hours later saying they were “disappointed” with the politicians’ arguments.

'Three sets of buyers are in discussions'

“We would like to make it clear that we have kept the DCMS fully informed about the financial situation at Worcester Warriors,” the owners wrote.

“They are aware of the options which are on the table to save the club together with the disastrous implications posed to the club by any administration, in particular the risk of losing the club’s P-share. [A P-share entitles club owners to a greater cut of revenue from broadcasting and other central streams generated by the Premiership].

“The DCMS has been very supportive every step of the way and we thank them for their continued support and cooperation. The DCMS knows that three sets of buyers are in discussions with us. All three buyers are serious propositions and all the deals being considered would avoid the club going into administration. One of the buyers is moving at an especially rapid pace.”

Goldring and Whittingham also claimed that there had “no attempt at engagement whatsoever” from local MPs and reiterated their position with regard to the prospect of administration.

“Avoiding administration is in the best interests of the club’s creditors, not to mention its players and staff,” they said. “Pursuing a deal which includes payment to all creditors as well as working capital best serves the club and the local community. Therefore, the DCMS has been giving us the time to pursue viable options.

“On the other hand, forcing Worcester Warriors into administration as these MPs have asked risks the club losing its players and staff, losing its P share, wiping off the debt owed to local businesses and to HMRC, and incurring severe RFU sanctions.”

“We continue to work tirelessly on a solution to keep all aspects of Worcester Warriors in business, able to pay its debts, and able to carve out a future which holds success both on and off the pitch.

“We understand that we are under scrutiny and that our actions are being questioned. Our best response to this is to stay focused and put all our time and energy into getting the best deal for the club, its players, staff, partners, sponsors and creditors across the line – and that is what we continue to do.”

Meanwhile, London Irish chief executive Mark Bensted has called for the wider rugby community to attend Saturday's match between his club and Worcester to show their support for Warriors' players and staff following a turbulent few weeks.

“In difficult times like these, it is crucial that everyone involved in the sport rallies round to support their clubs and to show acts of solidarity wherever possible" said Bensted.

“I would very much like to encourage you all – supporters of both clubs and the wider rugby family, including supporters of Harlequins, Saracens and Richmond who don’t have a home match this weekend – to attend the game on Saturday in what promises to be a special occasion.

“All Worcester Warriors staff, players and supporters will feel a very warm London Irish welcome this Saturday, and I would encourage the wider rugby community to come along and show their respect and appreciation for them all.”

MarleyWasp

  • Guest
Re: Worcester
« Reply #77 on: September 06, 2022, 07:07:36 AM »
An interesting view on why the owners really aren't keen on administration: https://twitter.com/FoyChris/status/1566882940537212931?t=QeeBsiKm7E_zNYJrj6Kvaw&s=19

Rossm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7449
  • Hey, Slow Down.
    • View Profile
Re: Worcester
« Reply #78 on: September 07, 2022, 09:06:19 AM »
What's going on now? Article in today's Daily Telegraph.

Worcester Warriors twist after application submitted to transfer ownership of Sixways

Land Registry documents seen by Telegraph Sport detail move to switch the site to a new company as takeover talks continue

The fate of crisis club Worcester Warriors took another twist on Tuesday after it emerged an application has been made to transfer ownership of the Sixways Stadium and the surrounding land to a new company.

Land Registry documents seen by Telegraph Sport detail an application made on Friday to transfer the deeds for Sixways and seven other parcels of land around the stadium to a company called Triangle Estate & Petroleum Limited. The managing director is listed as Peter Feathersone, who appears to have had no previous involvement in rugby union.

Last month, it emerged that the club’s owners Colin Goldring and Jason Whittingham had sold the land around the stadium to companies they owned leading to fears that they were asset-stripping their own club, a claim they have vehemently denied.

On Monday night, Goldring and Whittingham claimed that talks with a potential buyer were “moving at an especially rapid pace.” Several club insiders believe that Triangle is one of the prospective buyers with the property transfer, which is yet to go through, being the first step in a takeover. Former Worcester chief executive Jim O’Toole heads a rival consortium and there is a third interested party according to Goldring and Whittingham.

Hours after a group of local MPs issued a statement calling for the Department of Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) to place the club into administration, Goldring and Whittingham insisted that would be the worst course of action for the club. Telegraph Sport understands their debt is around £30million and sources close to the consortium led by O’Toole believe administration is the only possible outcome to save the club in the long run.

On the pitch, Worcester are scheduled to start the Premiership season away to London Irish on Saturday. While director of rugby Steve Diamond has claimed kicking off their opening game is their “greatest hurdle”, an even bigger challenge may await in staging their first home match against Exeter Chiefs on Sep 18.

Worcester are in debt to a number of creditors, including utility companies, who are essential to the staging of a home match. A proportion of the off-field staff have also stopped working since their wages were not paid on time.

Several internal sources cast doubt on whether Worcester would be able to bring these suppliers and staff back on board in time for the Exeter game. “A lot of people around here have been stiffed by the club,” one source said. “No one is going to accept being paid next month when wages are being paid on time. Everyone will be saying show me the money and  quite rightly. Where they get that money from I have no idea.”

The cost of staging a home match is thought to be a six-figure sum while on Tuesday the club held a meeting about the outgoings necessary to fund a game. However, Premiership Rugby reiterated it has received “detailed assurances” from the club that they have the contracts in place necessary to host a full house at Sixways.

Worcester’s owners were unavailable for comment when approached by Telegraph Sport.
SLAVA UKRAINI!
HEROYAM SLAVA!

Rossm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7449
  • Hey, Slow Down.
    • View Profile
Re: Worcester
« Reply #79 on: September 07, 2022, 11:40:57 AM »
Some staff still yet to be paid August wages despite assurances

Chris Jones from the Beeb.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/62820629
SLAVA UKRAINI!
HEROYAM SLAVA!

welsh wasp

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 578
  • Wasps Rugby Fan
    • View Profile
Re: Worcester
« Reply #80 on: September 07, 2022, 05:42:58 PM »
So the current Worcester owners have given “detailed assurances” that they will be ready for the first match. A case of seeing is believing when the teams runs on to the field.

Rossm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7449
  • Hey, Slow Down.
    • View Profile
Re: Worcester
« Reply #81 on: September 07, 2022, 05:52:41 PM »
I think they may manage the first game, LI away, but the test will come when they play Exe at home for the following game.
SLAVA UKRAINI!
HEROYAM SLAVA!

NellyWellyWaspy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4039
  • Getting older a couple of minutes every day
    • View Profile
Re: Worcester
« Reply #82 on: September 07, 2022, 07:37:51 PM »
There was a report on Warriors on BBC TV Midlands News this evening, but I only caught the closing bit.

Rossm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7449
  • Hey, Slow Down.
    • View Profile
Re: Worcester
« Reply #83 on: September 10, 2022, 09:13:16 PM »
From the Beeb:

Steve Diamond warns club are in 'dire position' but owners still hope for new investment

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/62862490
SLAVA UKRAINI!
HEROYAM SLAVA!

Heathen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3094
    • View Profile
Re: Worcester
« Reply #84 on: September 12, 2022, 10:01:42 AM »
From this morning's Times. Does not look good.

Worcester Warriors at risk of going bust with takeover deal ‘set to collapse’
A bid for the club is believed to be ‘miles away’ from what the co-owners want
Alex Lowe, Rugby Correspondent
Sunday September 11 2022, 7.30pm, The Times

Worcester Warriors are at risk of going bust after a takeover deal to secure the club’s future was left on the brink of collapse because of financial demands being made by the co-owners.

This latest setback raises immediate concerns as to whether Worcester will have enough funds to stage their first home game of the Premiership season, against Exeter Chiefs, on Sunday.

Jason Whittingham and Colin Goldring, the co-owners, have been in negotiations since the end of last week with an investor who was prepared to take on the club’s debts, which amount to about £25 million, and has the funds to run Worcester as a going concern for a number of years.

Whittingham told the BBC last week that “the preservation of rugby” was his only priority as he sought a buyer for Worcester and to keep the club out of administration. He said negotiations with interested parties were “not about throwing millions about”.

A bid for the club, which included the stadium and the land, was submitted on Sunday. It included financial terms for Whittingham and Goldring that are believed to be “miles away” from what the co-owners wanted.
Advertisement

The Times understands the potential investors are close to walking away. Whittingham denied that the deal had fallen through and said he was still working through the process.

Worcester face a winding-up court hearing on October 6 over a £6 million tax bill and the club have been unable to fulfil the August payroll in its entirety. The club took out a £14 million long-term loan from the government during the pandemic and also owe money to local suppliers, agents and a rival club.

Having opened their season with a defeat away to London Irish on Saturday night, Worcester have two home fixtures in six days that would generate critical funds — if the club can find a way of staging those games.

Staff who were paid 65 per cent of their August salaries are still owed the balance, while some employees have not received anything. The club has to find that money this week in addition to the match-day operating costs of about £120,000 if the Exeter game is to go ahead.
Sponsored

Simon Massie-Taylor, the chief executive of Premiership Rugby, confirmed that there were genuine fears that Worcester could go to the wall. “The next few weeks are absolutely crucial in determining whether they can find a long-term buyer and financial backer for the club,” he said. “We have got less than a month for the club to find a solution to the winding-up petition. We and the RFU are trying to support them through that process. We are not in a position to support them financially. It is an independent business that needs to find its own solution.”

Steve Diamond, Worcester’s director of rugby, had been cautious on Saturday when discussing the prospect of a takeover being completed.


DGP Wasp

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2447
  • Wasps Rugby Fan
    • View Profile
Re: Worcester
« Reply #85 on: September 12, 2022, 10:06:58 AM »
Oh dear.  Sounds ominous.  Whatever the reality of our own financial predicament, at least we have an owner who has the club's best interests at heart, unlike this pair of cowboys.

MarleyWasp

  • Guest
Re: Worcester
« Reply #86 on: September 12, 2022, 10:31:06 AM »
Rumours are that the owners want somewhere in the region of £7m for the club. They also want to avoid administration as it means that a) they'll end up with next to nothing and b) all the asset stripping will be under a microscope and won't look good for them at all. DCMS really need to step in and put the club in administration sooner rather than later or there will be no club to save.

Bloke in North Dorset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2467
  • Wasps Rugby Fan
    • View Profile
Re: Worcester
« Reply #87 on: September 12, 2022, 10:38:00 AM »
Another week of contact free training and so undercooked for their game against Chiefs.

If they survive it will have a bearing on the final table.  Irish would probably have won against a well prepared team, as would Chiefs, but you just never know.  And it’s likely to be another couple of matches until they’re up to match fitness.

bigad82

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 367
  • Wasps Rugby Fan
    • View Profile
Re: Worcester
« Reply #88 on: September 12, 2022, 04:10:13 PM »

Vespula Vulgaris

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2991
    • View Profile
Re: Worcester
« Reply #89 on: September 12, 2022, 04:29:39 PM »
Wow!
https://www.awwrfc.com/statement/

Looks like O'Toole thinks the current owners are trying to screw the club too.
Please consider supporting the forum in 2022! Donate Here