If you're centrally funded by the RFU, how much better for the game is that?
You're still not a financially viable business, and you lose a lot of the autonomy of your own club so that an organisation can cover some of your costs and move your best players to other cou be a if they feel it necessary. How much better is that really than an individual businessman who may actually have an affinity for the club?
My fear is financial issues on top of potential law suits for concussions etc. and repeated tinkering with the laws starts to see the game actually shrink rather than grow.
In 10 years we could really be discussing the end of the game, rather than the end of some clubs