Always a Wasp

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Raggs

Pages: 1 ... 129 130 [131] 132 133
1951
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: Unread Messages
« on: April 22, 2017, 05:11:09 PM »
Testing on an Ipad emulator on ios10 (professional tool, not just some amateur thing) it works ok.

However, none of our working fines really helps :D.  Any more info for us Fats?

1952
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: Unread Messages
« on: April 22, 2017, 01:14:39 PM »
Do you see this text at the end of the address bar when you click the New link? .msg0#new

Do you let the page load fully, or start scrolling beforehand?  Could just be an issue with ipads or the browser you're using, which browser is it.  VV will be able to check for compatibility issues with it and the forum software.

1953
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: Unread Messages
« on: April 21, 2017, 04:50:51 PM »
Do you see the New text at the end of the topic title? Or is it when you select it, it just doesn't take you to the latest unread message?

1954
I've not been even reading the long topics on drunken wasps, let alone not replying.

Maunder is one that confuses me a bit to be honest.  He's looked solid, but little more.  I've not seen the breaks or flair that Youngs gets rightly praised for when he's having a good game. I've not seen an amazing kicking game. I've not seen him driving the tempo.  He's looked like a very typical Exeter player to be honest, good basics and solid performance, but I've not seen things from him as we have from the likes of LCD or Slade, who have shown genuinely impressive physical/skillful  aspects to their game.

I understand that Maunder is young, but the other young guys that have broken through and made a real impression have shown glimpses of real game breaking talent, even at a young age (Farrell for his determination, Ford, Daly, Billy V, Curry twins).  I'm not suggesting that every player that makes it to international was a game breaker at age grade, but those that weren't took seasons to grow their all round game to very very solid performers (Launchbury I suppose would be a good example).  Perhaps I've just not seen enough of Maunder, but he's struck me as a Wigglesworth, rather than a Youngs (albeit a better passer) or a Robson.

1955
I've not posted as much as I'd probably have expected on the international selections.  In truth, it's because I'm rather shocked, and not sure what to say.  I'm shocked Launch isn't going to the lions, I'm shocked that Taylor and Robson aren't off to Argentina, surprised that Hask isn't on the Lions and that Wade+JCW aren't off to Arg, and disappointed that Jones and Symons aren't off either.

I'm not sure what Eddie is trying to do, all I can really see is that he's seemingly managed to get almost every single vaguely promising player in the AP, involved in one camp or another.  Perhaps trying to see everything that is on offer.

I can't say I think taking the Currys to Arg is a bad idea, they're both already doing so well at just 18, that they could have big futures.  Equally Maunder has settled well at AP level from what we've seen.  Fiji Joe has future England wing written all over him, so I can't argue that.  Mallinder has class but needs to prove he can be physical in defence etc.  My only concern is that England isn't where these players should be developing their skills.  They should be showing effectively international ability with their clubs, that show them to basically be ready for international selection (not necessarily blow the international world away, but at least do their job effectively), rather than international potential which is attempted to be developed at international level.

Perhaps he's happy with his normal 25/26 that he's using, and confident they can go all the way to 2019, and now he's looking for players that in 3-4 years time could be capable of taking over, but as I said, I think players should show they are capable with their clubs, and then be given a shot, rather than show that they are half decent when young, but never get anywhere.  A huge number of players have looked like potential rockstars as youngsters, but never  really developed or improved, and especially after a 2nd or 3rd season after analysis has exposed their weaknesses no longer look like internationals in the making.

I just hope that we don't pin our future hopes on a large number of very young players, who never end up reaching the potential they showed, whilst a number of already talented mid 20 year old players, miss out on the international exposure required to take their game to the utmost level.  There's always a danger of chasing the most exciting youngster, and considering someone at 27 to be over the hill, when in truth they could easily continue to operate at an exceptionally high level until well into their 30s.

1956
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: Argentina 2017
« on: April 20, 2017, 10:57:37 AM »
Proper pre-season for more of our guys then.

1957
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: Argentina 2017
« on: April 20, 2017, 09:55:21 AM »
No Taylor (only 2 hookers), no JCW (low on props too I believe).

Can't believe no Robson myself, but then I wouldn't.

1958
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: Unread Messages
« on: April 20, 2017, 09:42:00 AM »
Click where it says New next to the topic, it'll take you straight to the first unread message.

1959
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: Argentina 2017
« on: April 20, 2017, 09:41:30 AM »
No Wade isn't shocking, no Robson though... no Spencer or Simpson either.

What the hell Eddie?

1960
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: Argentina 2017
« on: April 19, 2017, 03:58:50 PM »
Argentina is going to be tough as hell, and with 16? English players already with the Lions, I don't think we really need to build depth other than that we've been forced to (maybe fullback).  Go with the normal starters (Hartley, Launch, Hask, Robshaw) and then fill in the gaps, and use some of the space to check out some more 15 options.

1961
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: Am I imagining it?
« on: April 19, 2017, 03:57:22 PM »
I don't think he's lost that much.  To my knowledge he still trains with Dan Baugh in the mornings.  I think he's a naturally big guy, who's still got a hell of a lot of muscle, just some middle aged spread on top that makes it look worse.

1962
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: After sleeping on it
« on: April 19, 2017, 10:11:10 AM »
Now rewatched, both scrum halves with mistakes (one pass to ground each, think both got caught by a boot when trying to clear it a second time, Simpson was charged down).  Robson had a moment of magic around 69, making a great break, a chip over that with a different bounce could have set himself or Wade up, or with a worse kick from Bristol, given us really great field position.  I'd argue that his pushing the pace also lead to Bassett's 2nd try.

At the point he came on, the game was also already won.  Why push the tempo as much when the TBP and game are both basically secured, better off just trying to keep structures etc.

2 weeks now, hopefully Cips can get fully healed.  Wonder what's in Dai's head for selection.

1963
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: What's your favourite pod cast?
« on: April 19, 2017, 09:16:39 AM »
Eggchasers comes out twice a week if there's domestic and internationals going on, otherwise it'll be one or the other.

1964
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: What's your favourite pod cast?
« on: April 19, 2017, 08:15:42 AM »
Listen to eggchasers, flats and shanks and rugby pod.  Occassionally BT sport podcast (since I can't watch the show).

Have tried Alex Corbiseiros pod, but gave up on it after it just seemed to be a variety of people interviewing Corbs.  Tried Full Contact too, but whilst it has some interesting parts, it's less accessible and I disagree with some of what they're saying too much :D.  Also tried the wasps podcast thing, but found it too opinionated and complaining about the ref etc.

I would enjoy a podcast that had a bit more analysis, rather than chats with the boys, which is what most seem to become.

1965
Wasps Rugby Discussion / Re: After sleeping on it
« on: April 17, 2017, 09:33:49 AM »
Defensively i doubt it. I just hope with more intensity it becomes better. In attack? I'd guess we almost certainly have some set piece plays that won't have been seen before.

Pages: 1 ... 129 130 [131] 132 133