His statement is if not mendacious then at least designed to obfuscate what has happened. Denying the training facilities rumour is actually worse than if he was actually hiding behind the alleged broken promises about facilities, because if it has nothing to do with facilities then he was surely under contract- how has he left the club then? He has not been forced out, and was under contract. If he has activated a break clause about training facilities in his contract, but is leaving not because of them then he should explain that, even if it makes him sound like a bit of a weasel, because to be honest I can accept a player being a bit of a weasel in order to further themselves in some way- in this case his likely property or investment portfolio that Sarries claim to not be part of players' salaries, or the fact that his mates play for the club. Right now this statement comes across as the full weasel, its contradictory and attempting to square the fact that he has chosen to leave with the fact that he wants to stay and has given no reasons as to why he wants to leave.
On a personal level I cannot understand how some put him in the same category as Wade, for example, a completely different kettle of fish whose departure has not left a sour taste in my mouth save for the regret at a loss of a great talent. I don't wish Daly ill, but should his move fail to live up to his expectations, I certainly won't be feeling sympathy for him.