https://docs4opendebate.be/en/open-letter/
Another POV?
Doesn't help their case when number of new cases in Belgium have tripled since they wrote that.
First massive red flag for me is this bit: The WHO originally predicted a pandemic that would claim 3.4% victims, in other words millions of deaths, and a highly contagious virus for which no treatment or vaccine was available.
I'm 95% sure that the WHO didn't predict that, they stated that it was the case fatality rate, which is very different from the infection fatality rate. Even early on (imperial paper from way back when) they were looking at ifr of a little below 1% (0.65% was used by Imperial if I recall correctly, read it a few times but some time ago). That 3.4% figure is pushed a lot in strawman arguments I've seen.
Next up they compare it to Flu. You can see in any country where the disease has taken hold, that this has by far and away exceeded any flu season.
Annnnnnnd I'm done.
They're talking about it failing Koch's postulates. Koch's postulates were formed before viruses were known about. You cannot grow a virus in pure culture like you can bacteria. They're basically denying the existence of virus's (except of course when they want to use the flu as another strawman). There are updated criteria (since 1884) that take this into account. Whoever wrote this is not a health expert, not a professional, but a pure crank, and I'm not wasting more time on it.