I'm a bit angry that none of our more experienced players questioned whether going for the tail of a line out in those conditions was the best idea.
Pretty sure it looked like experienced players making the call - Launch, Rowlands and Gaskell! Goodey suggested that the 3-pointer wasn't a banker.
With hindsight, a tap and go probably would have been the best option!
VV I'm kind of with you but only to a point. I'm not in the 'Just happy to be there camp'. We grafted, won our games and deserved to be there, no matter how unexpected it was, the two things aren't the same. We didn't win a raffle to get there and may not get there again for a while.
I haven't posted before now because of how pissed off I am. I can't wrap my head around how a captain of 68 England caps comes to the conclusion that in pissing rain and wind, against a team that has stolen our lineout all day, with pressure on a 2nd/3rd pick hooker...the best option is a lineout, not any line out, a long line out.
Its such a bad option it almost isn't even an option..I can't fathom it.
Whilst I can't prove it because I can't predict the future, that for me was a game loser and lost points aside, it drained the team of any remaining energy and we got pushed the length of the field. It's been said elsewhere so it's nothing new, getting it my chest I guess.
So deflated yes, but not as deflated as I am dumbfounded, disappointed and annoyed.