Login with username, password and session length
I do not like this one bit. It is supposed to be a EUROPEAN competition.https://www.news24.com/sport/rugby/unitedrugbychampionship/sa-rugby-set-for-big-awakening-next-season-as-more-european-competition-looms-20220502
Unbelievable. All this talk about player welfare and putting the players health first…is obviously nothing but loose talk. Once again, rather than being a bit more creative with increasing exposure, they’ve gone for the fast and easy route of bringing in another nation…that doesn’t sit in Europe. Imagine the extra stress and logistics this is going to cause each club. Maybe we will be better off in the Challenge Cup next season? Or maybe 8th place doesn’t qualify anyway?
Quote from: hopwood on May 05, 2022, 02:20:26 PMUnbelievable. All this talk about player welfare and putting the players health first…is obviously nothing but loose talk. Once again, rather than being a bit more creative with increasing exposure, they’ve gone for the fast and easy route of bringing in another nation…that doesn’t sit in Europe. Imagine the extra stress and logistics this is going to cause each club. Maybe we will be better off in the Challenge Cup next season? Or maybe 8th place doesn’t qualify anyway?You've completely lost me... There is the 'European' debate..but that's a moot point as to whether that just nation or competition. The traditionalist in me would prefer it to remain European nations, that said, the viewer in me would prefer to see a healthy competitive game, than yet another spanking of an Italian team, if it came down to it.But what's your point about player welfare? Unless you have additional knowledge, the format and # of games hasn't been publicised, so what's your 'loose talk' beef?I'm not sure there is much additional stress or logistics to consider for a professional rugby team either..
So where are those 3 places coming from? Assuming it remains a 24 team tournament, does that then mean only 7 from each of the European leagues to accommodate? Or are EPRC currently devising an even more convoluted format for next year's competition with 27 teams?
Quote from: Hymenoptera on May 05, 2022, 03:00:39 PMQuote from: hopwood on May 05, 2022, 02:20:26 PMUnbelievable. All this talk about player welfare and putting the players health first…is obviously nothing but loose talk. Once again, rather than being a bit more creative with increasing exposure, they’ve gone for the fast and easy route of bringing in another nation…that doesn’t sit in Europe. Imagine the extra stress and logistics this is going to cause each club. Maybe we will be better off in the Challenge Cup next season? Or maybe 8th place doesn’t qualify anyway?You've completely lost me... There is the 'European' debate..but that's a moot point as to whether that just nation or competition. The traditionalist in me would prefer it to remain European nations, that said, the viewer in me would prefer to see a healthy competitive game, than yet another spanking of an Italian team, if it came down to it.But what's your point about player welfare? Unless you have additional knowledge, the format and # of games hasn't been publicised, so what's your 'loose talk' beef?I'm not sure there is much additional stress or logistics to consider for a professional rugby team either..What about playing at altitude if you're not used to playing at altitude?What about the extra fly-time, travel, time away from families.The logistics for the backroom staff. It all adds up. It certainly doesn't reduce the workload of already flogged (elite) players.
Can Sale be counted as one of the SA teams.