Let's not forget there is also a definite and recent precedent for deferral.
Indeed.
The argument against deferral appears to be the international games but that means either:
1. The internationals take place without those involved in the final or
2. The final takes place without international players.
My view is 1 (obviously
) but even 2 stops rugby being made to look ridiculous, especially if Bristol did win as we’d have headlines along the lines of losing semi-finalists crowned champions. If that doesn’t bring the game in to disrepute I can’t think of anything that would.
As far as the internationals go, we've got Italy in the 6N; I mean no disrespect to Italy but if an England side shorn of Wasps and Exeter internationals can’t beat them England has serious problems and Jones needs to be sacked.
The rest of the internationals are just to earn TV revenue and with the WC 3 years away there isn’t a great deal to learn. The TV companies may scream that they’re paying for the best sides, but they don’t have a veto on selection policy.