Cips constantly undermined his own opportunities. A huge waste of talent perhaps, but nevertheless it's easy to see why coaches may prefer not to have him. Especially with the erratic results he could often bring. He is brilliant indeed, but I can really understand not picking him when he seems to burn bridges so quickly. I wonder if he had/has a similar self destructive streak as Joe Marler when it came to international
I do agree.
Over the years, with various head coaches ignoring Cipriani, it became clear that there was something other than his on field ability that was affecting their decisions.
And personally, I'm all for having a happy team/squad/club above all else... So if he genuinely is a disruptive influence within the squad then I wouldn't want him
However, I firmly believe he would have been capable of transforming England's back play, and making us one of the most dangerous, attacking teams around.... Coupled with our usual forward dominance, I believe there's a strong chance England would have become a hugely exciting team and ranked No 1 in the world.
Yes, he undoubtedly has off games where he doesn't shine or goes missing, but he'll have a lot more games where he's makes all the right calls.
If you look through England teams for the last 15 years you'll see plenty of regular England internationals who have poor or quiet games where they're either not involved in the important moments, or make complete howlers, yet they continue to be regulars.
I feel that Cipriani's rugby ability is viewed differently to other players' ability because he has a higher skill level and vision ceiling than most, so when he doesn't hit those extreme highs, he's seen as poor ......... And then he gets drunk and gets hit by a bus.
I do believe it's all his own fault, but I also believe that for a few years we would have seen an unparalleled England side
Where do I donate my £5?